On March 19, 2025, a significant scandal erupted in Thailand involving May Wasana, a wealthy businesswoman, and Diew Arisara, a popular actress. The situation revolves around valuable items worth over 62 million baht that Diew reportedly borrowed from May, with allegations that these items were subsequently pawned without May’s knowledge.
This dramatic turn of events saw May publicly express her heartbreak as she confronted the reality that her prized possessions had vanished. "I found out that the items I entrusted Diew with were not returned and instead pawned off," May lamented during a television interview. The emotional toll was evident, with May admitting, "Seeing the posts about my missing items felt like a betrayal. It was hard to breathe knowing my trust had been broken. I just want my belongings back."
Diew Arisara, meanwhile, acknowledged her actions in a response that was filled with regret. During a phone interview while she was in Taiwan, she commented, "I never intended to deceive anyone. I was under immense pressure financially and mistakenly left the items in places I shouldn’t have. I thought I was borrowing them, but now I realize how wrong that was." Her admission came after increasing scrutiny from social media and the press, as allegations piled up against her.
The items in question included extravagant pieces such as a Richard Mille watch valued at 13.8 million baht, a BVLGARI necklace worth 15.2 million baht, and several rare handbags that together precipitated financial distress for both parties involved.
May recounted how she first came to know Diew. They initially connected when Diew commissioned May’s factory to produce goods, depositing a substantial 22 million baht as a down payment. However, it soon became clear to May that this money was not Diew’s own but borrowed from a partner associated with the actress.
On August 6, 2024, the trouble began when Diew reached out to May through a chat, asking to borrow 20 million baht to settle debts, threatening to expose their financial issues if she didn’t help. Feeling compelled to lend a hand, May obliged, believing Diew was in genuine need. She allowed Diew to take her high-end items as collateral during this stressful period.
"At that moment, I thought I was helping a sister in need; little did I know, it was a path to deeper betrayal," May reflected solemnly on her motivations.
Things took a darker turn when May discovered through text exchanges that Diew had pawned her valuables, leaving her devastated and questioning her judgment. "It was a crushing realization. Here I was trying to support someone, and they were using my possessions to settle their own affairs," May explained.
Adding to the tumultuous emotional landscape, Diew attempted to clarify her situation in interviews, stating, "My intentions were never malicious. I was overwhelmed and made poor decisions. I didn't know how to cope with my financial troubles. I apologized repeatedly, but the consequences remain."
The public discourse surrounding the incident amplified when Diew’s additional debts were revealed. She faced outstanding liabilities, including a whopping 12.5 million baht owed on loans. In her interviews, she expressed hope that by addressing these debts, she could eventually restore her financial standing. "I hope to sort everything out once I return to Thailand; my priority is to make amends and for everyone to recognize that I am actively working on my payments, especially for May’s items," Diew stated.
The scandal has ignited fierce discussions on social media, with netizens taking sides and criticizing both parties. While some decried Diew's actions as unforgivable, others sympathized with her situation, pointing out the financial desperation that led to such extreme measures. "It’s heartbreaking to see both of them in such a difficult position. Wealth doesn’t guarantee wisdom about spending or borrowing," noted one observer.
In light of the escalating drama, officials have also become involved. Police reported that a formal complaint was filed against Diew, with allegations of embezzlement and fraud being considered. "As of now, we have received a complaint from May and will proceed with questioning tomorrow, March 20, to gather all necessary evidence," said Police Colonel Manun Kaewkham, indicating that the matter might develop into a legal case if facts are substantiated.
Despite the ongoing turmoil, May remains resolute about recovering her belongings and settling this matter amicably. "I don’t seek revenge; I just want what is rightfully mine back. It’s not just about the money; it's about trust and honesty sinking into the shadows of greed," she emphasized.
This unfolding drama is a gripping reminder not only of the complexities of financial relationships among those in the public eye but also underscores the fragility of trust in personal dealings. As both parties navigate their way through the turmoil—with intense scrutiny from not just legal authorities but also the public—the hope remains that resolution, and eventually reconciliation, will come to light.
