Rima Hassan, a member of the European Parliament representing the political party La France Insoumise, faced denial of entry to Israel on February 24, 2025, following orders from Israeli Interior Minister Amichai Chikli. Hassan arrived at Tl-Aviv's Ben Gurion Airport, where she was immediately informed she could not remain on Israeli soil. This decision stirred significant controversy, sparking reactions not only from her supporters but also from various political figures across Europe.
Hassan, known for her strong pro-Palestinian views, has been vocal against policies she perceives as oppressive. According to her statement on social media, if she could not return to Palestine herself, she would hope future generations, including her children and grandchildren, would be able to. “If it’s not me who returns to Palestine, it will be my children; if not my children, then my grandchildren,” she declared, promising determination to return with palpable emotion.
The incident has drawn comments from notable politicians, including Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the leader of La France Insoumise. He described the refusal of Hassan as "maltreatment" and criticized the Israeli government's actions. He urged solidarity among French politicians, calling out National Rally president Jordan Bardella for his silence on the matter, highlighting what he deemed to be hypocritical behavior from those who expressed nationalist sentiments.
Mélenchon utilized social media platform X to share his thoughts, stating, "Rima Hassan, French Member of the European Parliament, and the official delegation of the European Union, arrived at Tel Aviv airport and were turned away on the order of the Diaspora Affairs Minister Amichai Chikli.” He went on to encourage Bardella to stand against the actions of Israel, framing it as significant not only for shared national identity but also for the treatment of representatives of their nation.
The refusal at the airport was justified by Israeli officials as part of national security. The Interior Minister’s office described Hassan as someone who has consistently advocated for the boycott against Israel, noting her history of public statements perceived as anti-Israel sentiment. On social media, Chikli went so far as to label Hassan "antisemitic"—a term some Israeli officials have increasingly employed to confront criticism against their national policies.
Reactions among lawmakers were swiftly divided, with many from the left condemning Israel's actions. “Once again, Israel behaves like a rogue state by refusing access to a European delegation,” remarked Anthony Smith, another member of the European Parliament, expressing solidarity with Hassan. His sentiment echoed through many circles, where there is concern about the treatment of those perceived to be supportive of Palestine.
Other political responses stirred heated debates online. Some right-wing Israeli figures expressed triumph over the decision to deny Hassan entry. Meyer Habib, former member of the Knesset, voiced his delight at the episode, emphasizing his view on maintaining strict borders against perceived adversaries. Similarly, social media commentators described Hassan derogatorily as “a piece of antisemitism,” reinforcing her controversial standing within the political arena.
The circumstances surrounding Hassan’s travel to Israel raise questions. Critics questioned her motives, as she has openly criticized Israel and aligned with calls for armed resistance against its existence. The minister’s statement reflected broader security concerns lodged against individuals associated with pro-Palestinian activism—a term increasingly tied to anti-Israel rhetoric.
There's more to Hassan's history too. She has previously made headlines for her remarks on the Hamas-led aggression, calling it "legitimate" as well as attending pro-Hamas demonstrations. At the same time, she was also seen involved with groups opposed to the narrative centered on Israel's security, which undoubtedly played role on the backdrop of her rejection.
The refusal is perceived not only as political suppression but as emblematic of heightened tensions globally. Many see her as emblematic of the Palestinian struggle, attempting to portray her experience as yet another sign of Israeli aggression against those advocating for Palestinian rights. Analysts and commentators noted how this incident could impact discussions around human rights and international relations within the EU and the broader Middle East.
This denial of entry may also signal Israel's resolve to control its narrative, dismissing voices it perceives as antagonistic. Whether this expulsion leads to intensified international scrutiny remains to be seen. Observers will be watching closely as Hassan and her supporters continue to rally for Palestinian narratives and rights.
The scene at the airport speaks volumes, highlighting the rift between differing political ideologies not just within Israel, but across Europe. Public sentiment appears divided along the same lines—increased polarization leaves room for inevitable friction. Totality of responses both from Israel and European members paints complex picture ahead of future engagements.