Megyn Kelly has come under fire for expressing regret over supporting the Philadelphia Eagles following the team's alleged decision to skip visiting the White House after their recent Super Bowl victory. The former Fox News host's comments have reignited conversations surrounding sports, politics, and the longstanding controversy between athletes and the current administration.
The Eagles secured their second Super Bowl win on February 9, 2025, defeating the Kansas City Chiefs 40-22. But shortly after their victory, social media rumors began to swirl, hinting at the team's intention to decline any invitation to visit President Donald Trump at the White House. Although reports indicated the Eagles had collectively decided against the trip, the White House later clarified no official invite had been extended.
Kelly revealed her feelings on social media, lamenting her support for the Eagles. Responding to another user on X, known as "Toxic Cowboy," who expressed displeasure at the team’s supposed standoffishness toward Trump, Kelly echoed his sentiments: "SAME. GO F YOURSELVES EAGLES. My husband is a fan so I got onboard but F this BS," she tweeted. Kelly's tweet generated considerable attention, reflecting the divided sentiments among Eagles fans.
The situation drew energized comments from others on social media. Many users chimed in, with some criticizing Kelly for potentially spreading misinformation. Others expressed concern over the veracity of the reports on the Eagles' intentions. One user stated, "Well Megyn, you are NOT out of bounds here. Let the Eagles come out, and put an end to this question once, and for all!" Another added, "I was about to throw my whole gear away over this," reflecting mixed feelings within the fan community.
Despite Kelly’s outburst, the confusion about the Eagles’ White House invitation seems to stem from widespread speculation rather than confirmed plans. The U.S. Sun reported earlier this month on potential objections from the Eagles, with anonymous sources within the organization claiming there was discussion about declining any invitation should one be offered. The source cited strong sentiments among the players favoring social justice and equality and their collective decision to not engage with the current administration.
Historically, this is not the first time the Eagles have faced such scrutiny. The team's players famously turned down a White House invitation after their 2018 Super Bowl victory, with reasons rooted deeply within political and social contexts. Many players supported the movement for social justice sparked by former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s protests against police brutality, directly opposing Trump’s views on national anthem protests.
The Eagles' owner, Jeffrey Lurie, who has publicly supported progressive causes and Democratic political candidates, has become known for his commitment to activism and his players’ right to express their beliefs. His liberal stance has occasionally strained his relationship with some conservative owners within the NFL, but Lurie continues to champion progress within the league, advocating respect, integrity, and equality — values he believes should guide the team.
The exchange on social media has brought these issues to the forefront again, with players and fans dissecting the lengths they are willing to go for their beliefs. Kelly's comments have sparked discussions about athletes' roles beyond sports, and how their political stances can impact fan loyalty.
Overall, the situation remains volatile as more information circulates and sentiments shift. The Eagles have yet to officially respond to Kelly's criticisms or clarify their position publicly. With the upcoming season just around the corner, fans will undoubtedly continue to watch closely, awaiting clarity on whether their team will take similar steps to challenge political norms as they did two years prior. The Eagles' stance on social justice versus the appeal of the White House remains poised for continued debate as the intersection of sports and politics makes headlines once again.