On March 4, 2025, the Hyogo Prefectural Assembly's Hundred-Member Committee released findings from its investigation concerning allegations against Governor Motohiko Saitō, concluding the prefecture's response to whistleblower documents was fraught with significant issues.
The investigative report, unanimously approved by the committee, identified multiple instances of potential power harassment by Saitō, labeling some of his actions as 'inappropriate and could be considered power harassment.' These actions include instances of loud reprimands directed at employees and throwing objects at them, signaling serious misconduct.
Throughout the investigation, which commenced after the former Director-General of the Hyogo Prefectural Citizens Affairs Department filed whistleblower documents alleging seven distinct issues, the committee sought to determine the authenticity of these claims. It became evident the committee faced challenges, as some allegations were unverified, particularly those connected to pre-election activities surrounding the 2021 gubernatorial election.
Notably, Saitō's handling of internal communications also came under scrutiny. The report detailed over 4,855 chat messages sent to employees between August and December 2023, with about 44% sent during night hours and holidays. This statistic raised concerns about the appropriateness of work-related communications extending beyond regular working hours.
Other significant findings from the report detailed the governor's anger over minor procedural matters, such as scolding staff about the placement of car stoppers near the government building. Witnesses reported Saitō's explosive reactions, including instances where he showed frustration over the arrangements made by his staff, such as stopping his official vehicle at inappropriate locations.
The handling of the whistleblower documents underscored the committee's primary focus. The report concluded the governor's administration likely violated the Public Interest Whistleblower Protection Act by prioritizing the identification of the whistleblower over verifying the claims outlined within the document. The committee noted Saitō’s decision to name the whistleblower publicly during press briefings significantly undermined the protection these laws are supposed to provide.
Despite the weight of the allegations, during the investigation, Saitō consistently maintained his innocence, asserting the claims stemmed from malice. He characterized the whistleblower document as 'groundless' and even claimed it slandered his character. He stated, 'I believe the processes followed were appropriate and reflect standard operating procedure.' This stance put him at odds with the majority findings of the committee.
Chairman of the Hundred-Member Committee, Keichi Okutani, emphasized the major role the committee played. He remarked on the necessity for government officials, including Saitō, to understand the importance of implementing changes to support protective measures for whistleblowers. His comments reflect broader concerns about creating a workplace conducive to reporting misconduct without fear of reprisal.
Other revelations highlighted possible infractions around the acceptance of gifts by Saitō. The report conceded there were actions perceived as personal consumption and stated, 'It cannot be denied such actions evoked speculation of bribery,' indicating potential conflicts of interest tied to governance practices.
Public response to the report has been mixed, with many citizens voicing concern over the impact of Saitō's alleged power harassment on workplace culture and trust within the local government. Some community members are calling for his resignation to pave the way for leadership changes deemed necessary for restoring public confidence.
Further complicate the findings, the report discussed kickbacks allegedly involved during fundraising efforts for the Hanshin/Orix victory parade, which raised questions about the propriety of financial dealings within Saitō's administration. While the investigation noted no concrete evidence of kickbacks, it did indicate there were troubling patterns observed during the financial engagements.
With the findings now public, the prefectural assembly is anticipated to convene for discussions about potential legal and administrative actions stemming from this report. Saitō has not yet indicated any plans to mitigate the impacts of the report or changes to his governance style, prompting speculation about the stability of his position moving forward.
Overall, the report highlights the pressing need for governmental transparency and accountability, particularly concerning the treatment of whistleblowers and the management of governmental conduct.
At this juncture, Hyōgo Prefecture's administration faces the challenge of addressing these serious allegations and restoring public faith among its constituents. The future of Saitō's governorship may hinge on the actions taken following these findings, as both the assembly and the public seek assurance of ethical governance.
Members of the prefectural assembly plan to submit the report formally for broader review and discussion, with expectations for immediate consequences depending on the findings' impacts. The push for reform within Hyogo's governance could take center stage as the public demands increased accountability from its leaders.