The United States government has revoked the tourist visas of Baja California Governor Marina del Pilar Ávila and her husband, Carlos Torres. This decision comes amid a complex binational context that has raised eyebrows and prompted political reactions.
On Saturday, May 10, 2025, both Marina del Pilar and Carlos Torres confirmed the revocation through their official social media accounts. Carlos Torres, who serves as the director of strategic projects for the Baja California government and the Tijuana City Council, disclosed that he had received notification from U.S. consular authorities regarding his visa status. Shortly after, Marina del Pilar announced that she too had received a similar notification.
In her statement, Marina del Pilar expressed her unwavering support for her husband, stating, "My husband, Carlos, has faced a situation, and as in any shared life, that circumstance has also reached me. Shortly after the consular measure applied to him, I received a similar notification. I am sure and fully trust that the situation will be clarified satisfactorily for both of us."
This unexpected turn of events has drawn attention, particularly because just two days prior, Marina del Pilar had met with Christopher Teal, the U.S. Consul in Tijuana, to discuss strengthening cooperation on key issues such as security, economic development, and human rights.
Marina del Pilar's last visit to the United States was on April 29, 2025, when she promoted the Tianguis Trustico Binacional 2025 in San Diego, California. Accompanied by the Secretary of Tourism, Josefina Rodríguez Zamora, she participated in the inauguration of the Festival de México in San Diego, an event aimed at showcasing Mexican culture.
In response to the visa revocation, Carlos Torres stated, "The revocation of my visa responds to internal provisions of the Department of State," emphasizing that the decision does not imply any formal accusation, investigation, or legal action against him or his wife. He expressed disappointment that the situation had repercussions for Marina del Pilar, who he described as having faced the challenges with strength and serenity.
Political reactions have been swift. Lizbeth Mata Lozano, leader of the PAN (National Action Party) in Baja California, demanded clarification from the governor regarding the implications of the visa revocation. The context of this situation is further complicated by previous allegations that surfaced in May 2024, suggesting that Carlos Torres had been detained while crossing the border, allegedly for money laundering. However, those claims were never substantiated, and he later reappeared publicly to deny the allegations.
As the couple navigates this unexpected hurdle, both have reiterated their commitment to serving the people of Baja California. Marina del Pilar stated, "I have said repeatedly, governing my state is a source of pride, and I will continue doing so with my heart in front, with a clear conscience. My government will continue to work tirelessly to address the challenges we face for the benefit of the people of Baja California."
The reasons behind the U.S. government's decision to revoke their visas remain unclear, as officials have not publicly disclosed specific motivations. Common reasons for visa revocations can include violations of visa terms, previous legal issues, or perceived risks to national security. However, both Marina del Pilar and Carlos Torres have denied any wrongdoing.
As the situation unfolds, it raises questions about the implications for bilateral relations between Mexico and the United States, particularly in the context of ongoing discussions about immigration, security, and economic cooperation. The couple's ability to address these challenges while managing their visa status will be closely watched by constituents and political analysts alike.
In conclusion, the revocation of the tourist visas for Governor Marina del Pilar and Carlos Torres has sparked significant political discourse and concern among the public. As both navigate this unexpected challenge, their commitment to serving their constituents remains steadfast, while the reasons for the U.S. government's actions continue to be a topic of speculation.
