Germany's Union Party has intensified its scrutiny of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) following widespread protests against right-wing extremism, issuing an extensive parliamentary inquiry consisting of 551 questions aimed at these groups. The inquiry targets several prominent organizations, particularly 'Omas gegen Rechts' (Grandmothers Against the Right), Greenpeace, and the fact-checking network Correctiv, raising questions about their government funding and political neutrality.
According to reports from taz and AFP, the Union's initiative is perceived as retaliation against NGOs for their involvement in antifascist demonstrations, wherein these organizations mobilized citizens to voice opposition against the far-right's influence. Friedrich Merz, leader of the Union, and other notable figures like Alexander Dobrindt have been pivotal in this inquiry, which demands clarity on the portion of funds these organizations receive from state programs and any political ties they may have.
Merz stated, "State-funded organizations must maintain political neutrality," arguing against any direct or indirect support for political campaigns. The inquiry's backdrop includes recent protests where NGOs significantly contributed to mobilizing opposition to the Union's policies, particularly concerning migration issues. The Union’s request for details on funding has drawn sharp criticism from various political entities, who see it as an attack on democracy.
Timo Reinfrank, managing director of the Amadeu Antonio Foundation, responded firmly, labeling the inquiry as "an intimidation attempt we categorically reject." He emphasized the importance of civil society organizations to highlight issues and stimulate debate, noting, "Democracy thrives on controversies, and it is imperative to engage these discussions."
Felix Kolb, co-founder of Campact, also criticized the Union's actions, describing the inquiry as "a seamless continuation of the Union's recent attempts to intimidate civil society and silence dissenting voices." He highlighted the troubling nature of the inquiry, stating, "Non-profit organizations are allowed to influence public opinion and criticize parties, whether the Union likes it or not."
Criticism has extended beyond NGOs to the political arena. Clara Bünger of the Left party characterized the Union's moves as reflective of authoritarian tendencies, stating, "This inquiry demonstrates the Union's vengeance for the recent antifascist protests and signals an unprecedented attack on democratic civil society." She asserted this approach is reminiscent of practices seen in authoritarian regimes, raising alarm as the Union appears poised to lead the next government.
Support from opposition benches, including the Green party, has echoed these sentiments. Sven Giegold, deputy leader of the Greens, described the volume of questions as akin to "a shooting list" directed at civil society, implying the intent behind the inquiry is not only to assess funding but to undermine organizations actively opposing the far-right.
Notably, the inquiry attempts to question groups such as Peta, Animal Rights Watch, Foodwatch, and the Deutsche Umwelthilfe, all of which have recently engaged politically by rallying against right-wing extremism. Amnesty International, too, condemned the Union's actions, stating, "This inquiry suggests these NGOs are operating as shadow structures exploiting taxpayer money to engage politically," heightening concerns over the potential ramifications for civil liberties.
Felix Kolb articulated concern over the broader strategy, indicating, "This inquiry aims to discredit civil society actors and potentially diminish their support as we head toward Merz's government. It’s clear their commitment to social justice and the fight against extremism is at stake here."
These sentiments were echoed by reactions from the Social Democrats, who noted their apprehension about the Union's tactics, drawing parallels to approaches utilized by the Alternative for Germany (AfD), which has similarly sought to intimidate organizations combating extremism.
The coalition government has previously sought to reform laws governing the status of non-profits to protect them from unwarranted intrusion. Observers now view the inquiry as emblematic of the Union's strategic shift as it prepares to command governance under Merz, prompting fears surrounding the safety and integrity of civil society.
Political experts agree the inquiry could significantly affect the Union's relationships with potential coalition partners. Sergey Lagodinsky, a Green MEP, remarked, "This inquiry is not just troublesome; it is alarming. Comparisons to Trump-era governance are being drawn here." Facing such scrutiny so early may shape the future of governance, indicating the delicate balance between authority and civil liberties is at stake.