Today : Jan 23, 2025
Politics
23 January 2025

Trump Administration Revokes Equal Employment Opportunity Act

With new executive order, President Trump dismantles decades-old protections aimed at ensuring workplace equality

On January 21, 2025, President Donald Trump issued sweeping directives through his executive order titled "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity," casting aside the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1965, long considered a cornerstone of anti-discrimination policy. The move, which has drawn sharp criticisms from civil rights advocates, abolishes affirmative action protocols intended to promote diversity across federal employment practices.

The executive order officially rescinded Executive Order 11246, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, which mandated federal contractors to adhere to anti-discrimination practices based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, and later sexual orientation and gender identity during hiring and employment processes. The 1965 order aimed to rectify historical injustices and discrimination against underrepresented groups, contributing significantly to increased workplace equality over the decades.

Trump's order justifies this rollback as necessary to end what he describes as "illegal preferences" associated with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, claiming these reprioritize unmeritocratic hiring practices detrimental to American workers. Notably, the President's proclamation reflects sentiments echoed throughout his prior campaigns, where he has consistently criticized DEI policies as enabling "reverse discrimination" and undermining the achievements based purely on individual qualifications and merit.

"The Federal Government is charged with enforcing our civil-rights laws. The purpose of this order is to do just this by ending illegal preferences and discrimination," his statement outlines, signaling not only the end of federal DEI directives but also encouraging the private sector to adopt similar stances. A significant portion of the order focuses on eliminating federal contractor obligations to maintain workforce diversity and affirmative action frameworks, effectively sidelining the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) which oversees such compliance.

Critically, this executive order does not erase the OFCCP itself, though it hints at possible revisions to its role, with speculation surrounding the agency pivoting toward ensuring merit-based hiring devoid of diversity mandates. "For 90 days from the date of this order, federal contractors may continue to comply with the regulatory scheme in effect on January 20, 2025," the order stipulates, allowing for transitionary measures as contractors adapt to the new compliance requirements.

Chuck Robbins, CEO of Cisco and head of the Business Roundtable, had previously recommended the lasting value of DEI practices, which adds layers of irony to the timing of Trump’s order as nationwide sentiment increasingly favors DEI frameworks since the heightened awareness following civil rights movements. Critics argue Trump is dismantling decades of hard-won protections, risking the socio-economic progress achieved for marginalized communities.

"It would significantly erode a civil rights enforcement tool required to sustain women’s progress," asserts Jocelyn Frye, president of the National Partnership for Women & Families, highlighting concerns raised by advocates before the executive order's release. The order's directive aims to force all executive departments to terminate any preferences, policies, or programs perceived as discriminatory.

Analyzing the historical transition, the push against DEI initiatives aligns prominently with conservative ideologies, tracing back to opposition against Johnson's original order, which was deemed radical during its inception and met with resistance from segregationists. The repeal marks the first time since LBJ's era where five successive GOP presidents upheld the executive order, with Trump's administration being the first to actively dismantle its guidelines.

While the future of workplace equality appears increasingly uncertain, many states may leverage existing frameworks to maintain similar affirmative action policies at state levels—with California and New York poised to sustain such regulations—mitigated against the pullback of federal mandates. With compliance measures shifting, federal contractors now find themselves at the crossroads, needing legal guidance to recalibrate their workforce strategies accordingly.

Questions loom about how this move might influence corporate America, particularly as some businesses had already begun to withdraw their DEI initiatives under pressure from conservative groups and political actors. The approach delineates both workplace risks and opportunities for federal agencies, who are now expected to compile lists of organizations for potential scrutiny under the lens of enforced meritocracy.

Upcoming civil compliance investigations will include public companies and universities, shifting the focus from diversity requirements to clear monitoring of merit-based actions across sectors. Critics like political strategist Basil Smikle Jr. warn about the potential erosion of political and economic influence among women and people of color. Many are concerned this signal opens the door to increased cronyism and discriminatory practices resurfacing.

Indeed, as Trump reestablishes federal directives aiming for non-discriminatory policies, the national dialogue surrounding justice, equity, and inclusion stands at its precipice. Observers can expect corporate and public reactions to trickle through, as advocates prepare to defend against perceived regressions in civil rights protections.

More than six decades removed from the historical establishment of these protections, the decision to repeal the Equal Employment Opportunity Act stands not only as a change to federal employment protocols but as the continuation of broader cultural conflicts over identity, race, and opportunity values within American society.