The Electric State, directed by Joe and Anthony Russo, marks the brothers' ambitious return to the screen with their latest film, released on March 14, 2025, on Netflix. Known for their success within the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) with Avengers: Endgame and Captain America: The Winter Soldier, their latest venture takes on the look of serious sci-fi but falls short of expectations both critically and narratively.
Billed as having one of the largest budgets ever, reportedly around $320 million, The Electric State adapts Simon Stålenhag’s illustrated novel, placing viewers in a retro-futuristic version of the 1990s. It tells the story of Michelle (Millie Bobby Brown), said to be searching for her brother Chris (Woody Norman) after the devastation of humanity from destructive robots which once served them.
From the outset, the film elicits anticipation with its storyline about Michelle, who embarks on her quest with the reluctance of smuggler John Keats (Chris Pratt), facing relentless bounty hunter Colonel Bradbury (Giancarlo Esposito) along the way. The Russo brothers, adept at fusing humor and action, appear to lose their comedic touch, slipping instead toward seriousness. Critics have noted, "The Electric State needs more than stunning visuals to succeed," as its layout of action sequences lacks the compelling staging their prior films exhibited.
The film’s foundational premise dwells deeply within the consequences of the failed robot uprising, one initially ignited by Walt Disney’s inventions. Once beloved automatons turned on their creators, leading to violent warfare which now leaves Michelle to navigate remnants of this dystopia.
Michelle’s character introduces layers of complexity as she attempts to rediscover her brother—cut off from her family and living under the care of the slovenly Ted (Jason Alexander). This backstory echoes common tales of loss but doesn't provide substantial development. Instead, the emotional weight seems to be forced upon viewers via melodramatic moments rather than genuine connection. Critics have remarked, "The emotional beats feel forced" as the film struggles to balance its narrative depth.
One key aspect of immersion within this alternate reality is Michelle's robot companion, Cosmo, who conveys information on her brother’s fate, sparking moments of shared adventure. Their interactions hint at levity but, again, fail to generate impactful chemistry mundane dialogue with little buildup to genuine humor.
Production-wise, the film boasts impressive visuals—post-apocalyptic landscapes and exquisitely engineered robotic characters contribute to its allure visually. Critics comment, "The Russos have clearly invested all their energies to make this world feel real," praising the elaborate effects but also noting how, with all the effort placed there, the final product lacks emotional resonance.
While the visuals capture attention, the film is criticized for its tonal inconsistency—caught between deep moral judgments about technology’s consequences and aspirations for light-hearted fun. One observer noted, "It’s never quite clear whether the film is warning of tech’s dangers or reveling in its possibilities.” This conflict results in the film seeming muddled, lacking the direction needed to channel its themes effectively.
The supporting cast deserves mention; Chris Pratt’s portrayal—a mixture of charm and detachment—does try to weave individuality through this sparse script, yet alike to Millie Bobby Brown's character, they both hang suspended without development. The muted chemistry raises questions as to whether the characters can stand on their own. Critics declare, "Brown feels miscast," indicating her character's arc not well-assuaged by overlong plot expositions.
Further exacerbated by pacing issues, the lack of engaging action scenes leads to frustration among audiences, described as "tiresome action sequences" and severely lacking punch. Critics lament on the repetitive nature of these action sequences as they yearn for excitement reminiscent of the brothers' earlier works.
The Electric State could have capitalized on its premise, tackling themes like love, acceptance, and the toll of technology on humanity. Yet, it succumbs to visual lust and ignores its core aspects, clashing morality alongside comedic ambitions. Critiqued as projecting yet another "missed opportunity" to weave film with depth, the conclusions and messages feel surface-level.
The audience's response may mirror the experience of viewers at this year's screening—initially excited, yet gradually diminishing as the narrative disappoints. The attempt to fuse heavy themes with youth-centric adventure resonates poorly, exploring the sentimentality of past losses but failing to engage the present.
Final thoughts suggest, even with potentially breathtaking visuals, The Electric State's deficiencies overshadow its successes. One review summarized the film's impact: "The Electric State needs more than stunning visuals to succeed," framing the final verdict—a spectacular budget isn’t sufficient if the emotional heft and inspiration are lacking.