In a surprising turn of events following the successful release of the adventure action film Kraken, Tatyana Brukhunova, wife of popular comedian Evgeny Petrosyan, has publicly criticized actress Diana Pozharskaya's performance. The film, directed by Nikolai Lebedev, has garnered enthusiastic reviews from audiences, but Brukhunova's remarks have added a controversial note to the overall praise.
Brukhunova took to her blog to express her discontent with Pozharskaya's portrayal of a geologist in the film. "The only female role turned out to be a failure. Diana did not cope: her character is flat, lacking emotional depth. There is no fear in the face of horror, nor a spark of feeling—this is especially noticeable against the backdrop of vibrant supporting characters," she stated. Her critique has sparked discussions among fans and film enthusiasts alike.
Despite her harsh judgment of Pozharskaya's performance, Brukhunova did not shy away from praising the film's visual aspects, stating, "Import substitution has succeeded! The visuals are fire, especially the Kraken itself. The direction and the male cast are all top-notch." This statement reflects her appreciation for the technical achievements of the film, which tells the story of a team of researchers confronting a mythical sea monster.
The film Kraken follows a submarine crew searching for a missing vessel in the Greenland Sea, only to awaken a giant Kraken in the northern waters. The cast includes prominent actors such as Alexander Petrov, Viktor Dobronravov, Alexey Guskov, and Sergey Garmash. While Brukhunova commended the male actors for their performances, she felt that Pozharskaya's character did not meet the film's high standards.
Brukhunova's comments come at a time when Russian filmmakers have been vocal about the challenges facing contemporary cinema. Film critic David Shneiderov also weighed in on Kraken, suggesting that it failed to perform well at the box office and recommending that viewers postpone their cinema outings for now. His critique adds a layer of complexity to the film's reception, highlighting the mixed reviews it has received.
Following Brukhunova's critique, reactions from her followers have been swift. Many agreed with her assessment, noting that while the film as a whole was commendable, Pozharskaya's performance was indeed lacking. Meanwhile, fans of Pozharskaya have taken to social media to defend her, expressing admiration for her work and showcasing their support.
Interestingly, Brukhunova's criticism did not deter her from recommending Kraken to her followers. She emphasized that despite her reservations about the female lead, the film is worth watching, particularly for its impressive visuals and storytelling. "I was pleasantly surprised by the film—it exceeded my expectations!" she added, highlighting her overall satisfaction with the production.
As the conversation around Kraken continues, it remains to be seen how this public critique will impact Pozharskaya's career and the film's ongoing reception. With a mix of praise and criticism, Kraken stands as a testament to the evolving landscape of Russian cinema, where both successes and failures are part of the journey.
In a broader context, Brukhunova's candid remarks reflect a growing trend among public figures to share their honest opinions about art and performance, influencing how audiences perceive both individual performances and the projects they are part of. As the film industry navigates through challenges, feedback from influential voices like Brukhunova can shape the conversation around artistic merit and audience expectations.
With the film's storyline revolving around a mythical creature and the dynamics of human emotion against the backdrop of danger, Kraken offers a blend of thrills and character exploration. However, as Brukhunova pointed out, the effectiveness of these elements can vary significantly based on the performances of the cast, particularly in a film where emotional depth is crucial.
In conclusion, as audiences continue to engage with Kraken, the dialogue surrounding its performances—especially that of Diana Pozharskaya—will likely persist. The interplay of criticism and praise serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in filmmaking, where every performance contributes to the overall impact of the story being told.
