Today : Mar 26, 2025
Science
24 March 2025

Study Reveals Lower Rates Of Necrotizing Enterocolitis In Japanese Infants

Research indicates that ethnicity alone does not account for significant differences in NEC incidence among preterm infants.

A recent comparative study has revealed significant differences in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) among preterm infants born in Japan compared to those born in California to mothers of Japanese ethnicity. The research, covering infants born between 2008 and 2019, found an alarming disparity: only 1.7% of infants born in Japan developed NEC, whereas the rates climbed to 4.5% among infants born in California to mothers from Japan, and up to 4.6% for those born to Japanese mothers of other origins.

The findings highlight a crucial aspect of neonatal health and could shed light on the underlying factors contributing to NEC among preterm infants. NEC is a life-threatening condition most commonly found in premature infants, characterized by inflammation and tissue death in the intestines. The research team utilized data from two extensive neonatal databases, the Neonatal Research Network of Japan and the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, to conduct their analysis.

Across the study, a total of 52,049 Japanese infants born in Japan were compared against 115 infants born in California to mothers born in Japan, 226 born to mothers of Japanese ethnicity in the U.S., and 12,275 infants born in California to non-Hispanic White mothers. Remarkably, after adjusting for various confounding factors, the odds of developing NEC remained significantly lower for infants born in Japan. The odds ratios were reported as 3.04 when comparing Japan to those born to mothers in California.

The research indicates that ethnic factors alone cannot account for the lower rates of NEC in Japan. The authors noted that despite expecting maternal lifestyle changes and perinatal practices to affect NEC outcomes, the incidence remained consistently low across the years. The study postulates that the cultural and clinical practices in Japan may play a pivotal role in preventing NEC.

As the authors intricately described, there are several nuances in maternal health and perinatal care that differ between the regions studied. For instance, while examining factors such as chorioamnionitis, diabetes, and birthweight, maternal profiles showed significant differences that could influence infant health outcomes.

The mortality rates among these infants also present a stark contrast; infants born in Japan exhibited the lowest mortality rates. Unadjusted logistic regression demonstrated that mortality among Japanese infants was significantly lower than those born in California to mothers of both Japanese ethnicity and non-Hispanic White mothers, escalating concerns regarding the care practices in different regions.

Interestingly, no differences in the incidence of spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) were identified among the various groups. However, both NEC and SIP complications demonstrated the lowest occurrence in infants born in Japan compared to their Californian counterparts. The study noted that competencies displayed in Japan, where the incidence of NEC remained stable and low through the years analyzed, could provide valuable insights into potential preventive measures in other regions.

Societal factors might further impact these findings; breastfeeding practices, infectious disease management, and hospital care protocols can vary widely, affecting infant morbidity rates. The ongoing analysis of NICU practices between Japan and California may reveal critical differences in management that could significantly influence NEC development.

Overall, the meticulous approach taken by the research team underscores the necessity of understanding the interplay between genetics, environment, and medical practices in addressing complex health issues like NEC. Further investigations into the cultural implications of maternal health and neonatal care could open pathways to enhance outcomes for vulnerable preterm infants globally.

The study’s contributions resonate deeply within the fields of neonatology and epidemiology, urging for an in-depth look into prenatal and postnatal frameworks, highlighting the distinctive outcomes exhibited by different populations.