Today : Jul 04, 2025
Science
14 March 2025

Study Links Aortomesenteric Angle To SISMAD Risks

Increasing Aortomesenteric Angles Significantly Elevate Risk of Dissection, Research Reveals.

A recent study has unveiled significant insights relating the aortomesenteric angle (AMA) to the incidence of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD), shedding light on this rare yet dangerous vascular condition.

Conducted at the Nanjing First Hospital, this study reviewed data from 105 patients diagnosed with SISMAD—where the artery undergoing dissection is devoid of other vascular complications—between January 1, 2013, and December 13, 2022. Interestingly, this group predominantly included males (87.6%) with a mean age of 54.8 years. The associations evaluated included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and critically, the degree of the AMA, which is formed between the superior mesenteric artery and the abdominal aorta.

Hypertension emerged as the most notable risk factor, demonstrating more than threefold increased odds of developing SISMAD, whereas the AMA proved to be significant as well; for each degree increase, the risk exhibited a 1.03-fold elevation.

To gauge the impact of varying AMA levels on SISMAD, patients were categorized as having small (<50°), intermediate (50-71°), and large (>71°) AMA levels. Analysis revealed strong correlations: those with intermediate angles faced 2.62 times greater odds of experiencing SISMAD, and the risk escalated to 4.50 times for patients with large AMA angles.

The findings call attention to the previously underappreciated role of the AMA, which ranged from 24.0° to 129.7° among SISMAD patients, averaging 69.6°. This elevation suggests potential hemodynamic forces affecting the arterial structure, particularly at the superior mesenteric artery's convexity, where dissections commonly begin.

Dr. Y. Shi and colleagues, authors of the study published recently, pointed out, “Increasing AMA was consistently associated with increasing SISMAD risk.” While the study analyzed the imaging characteristics of SISMAD, they concluded there was no significant difference noted by varying the AMA.

All included SISMAD patients displayed substantial pain relief post-treatment, averaging just 2.0 days for symptom resolution and experiencing no major complications such as bowel resection or hemorrhage. The median hospital stay was 9.0 days, culminating successfully without fatalities.

This research paves the way for future inquiries targeting the anatomical pathology surrounding SISMAD by establishing AMA's relevance within this rare disease spectrum. Despite the study's limitations, including its retrospective nature, the authors called for larger, multicenter prospective studies across different demographics to validate their findings.

With SISMAD rising due to improved imaging techniques, potentially leading to misdiagnosis, thorough investigation remains warranted. The broad societal implication centers sustainability on decreasing morbidity and mortality related to vascular dissections.

Overall, this study presents groundbreaking evidence associatively linking the AMA and the risk for SISMAD, emphasizing the necessity for clinicians to become increasingly aware of vascular angles during diagnosis and treatment strategies.