Today : Feb 26, 2025
Politics
26 February 2025

South Korea Investigates Major Tech Companies Over Data Leaks

Regulatory scrutiny intensifies as Apple and KakaoPay face allegations of unauthorized data transfer

South Korea is facing significant scrutiny over personal information leakage, with the government's investigation targeting several major tech companies, including Apple and KakaoPay. These investigations have raised alarm bells about the handling of user data amid rising cyber threats.

The national spotlight first turned to Apple when it was revealed the company transferred personal user information to Alipay without the necessary consent. According to reports from NewsPim, Apple representatives consistently claimed to be unaware of these data transfers, generating concerns among regulators and consumers alike.

On March 26, the Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) fined Apple 24.5 billion KRW (approximately 22 million USD) following allegations it had neglected user consent protocols. KakaoPay, another key player, faced similar charges. The company's failure to inform users before sending their data to external parties — estimated to involve approximately 40 million users — resulted in fines amounting to 59.7 billion KRW.

This situation is compounded by the emergence of sophisticated spyware applications, such as LightSpy and SpyLend, flagging ever-growing threats to user data privacy. LightSpy is particularly notorious for its ability to extract data from popular social media platforms, capturing personal messages, contact lists, and more. Cybersecurity experts warn of the unsettling trend where even applications from trusted sources may harbor spyware, amplifying the urgency for users to adopt rigorous data protection habits.

Cybersecurity firms have reported extensive leaks connected to these applications, emphasizing the need for heightened awareness. The vulnerabilities exposed by these spyware threats have drawn significant media attention, leading to calls for stronger privacy regulations to protect users.

Choi Jang-hyuk, Vice Chairman of the PIPC, highlighted the existing limitations faced when imposing fines on multinational companies, stating, "We are preparing legal amendments to address these shortcomings." His comments point to lawmakers’ recognition of the urgent need for stricter measures ensuring compliance with South Korea's data protection laws.

Meanwhile, responses from the affected tech companies have been mixed. For their part, Roborock reassured users about their data security protocols, emphasizing adherence to South Korean laws. They shared, "We apply rigorous TLS encryption protocols for all data sent to our servers, ensuring user data remains protected." This assertion intends to allay concerns following global outcry over data privacy issues connected with AI technologies.

Experts have reiterated the importance of being vigilant when engaging with applications. Professor Na Yeon-mook from Dankook University echoed this sentiment, stating, "Data aggregation and analysis must be done using anonymized data to minimize privacy risks." His comments stress the imperative for users to select trustworthy services and remain cautious about personal information leaks.

Given the rise of malware and more sophisticated phishing schemes, users must adapt their online habits, utilizing security solutions and maintaining updated appliances to help mitigate these risks.

Despite regulations, the conflict between rapid technological advancement and user privacy has grown increasingly complicated. With tech companies such as Apple and KakaoPay under investigation, South Korean users are called upon to engage with services more judiciously, ensuring their personal information does not fall prey to unauthorized exploitation.

The present moment reflects not only growing pains between technology and governance but also the emergent need for concrete solutions to address these persistent privacy challenges.