In a significant legal development, Sidick S., the husband of influencer Rens Kroes, has been ordered to remain in prison for at least another three and a half years following the rejection of his appeal by the Supreme Court of the Netherlands. This decision comes after a lengthy legal battle stemming from a 2016 rape case that has garnered substantial media attention.
On May 2, 2025, it was reported by HollywoodHuizen that Sid S. will continue to serve his sentence after the Supreme Court dismissed his cassation, a legal process that allows for a review of the lower court's decision. This ruling concludes a drawn-out legal saga that began with Sid's initial conviction in 2019 when he was sentenced to two years in prison for the rape of a young woman in Amsterdam.
The case dates back to an incident in 2016, when a woman reported being raped in her own home after allowing a man she did not know to use her bathroom. According to the victim, Sid S. threatened her during the assault, saying, "I'll break your neck if you move" and "I'll kill you seriously." These chilling statements were part of the evidence that led to his conviction.
In 2019, the court found Sid S. guilty, but he appealed the decision, claiming that the encounter was consensual and that the allegations were fabricated for financial gain. The victim, however, provided compelling evidence, including a panicked text message sent to a friend during the assault, indicating that Sid S. refused to leave her home.
In April 2024, Sid S. faced a retrial, where the court increased his sentence to 4.5 years, citing the severity of the crime. Following this verdict, Sid sought to appeal to the Supreme Court, but his case was ultimately rejected, confirming the previous rulings against him.
Throughout this ordeal, Rens Kroes has remained publicly supportive of her husband. Despite the serious nature of the charges against him, she has consistently stood by Sid, even marrying him in 2020 and having a daughter together. In statements made to the media, Rens has expressed frustration with the public prosecution service, labeling them as "incredibly sensationalist" in their handling of the case.
As the legal proceedings concluded, it was noted that Sid S. had already been incarcerated for over a year, and with the Supreme Court's ruling, he is now required to serve the remaining three and a half years of his sentence. This decision has sparked various reactions from the public and commentators alike, with some expressing disbelief at Rens's continued support for Sid.
The case has drawn significant media scrutiny not only because of the crime itself but also due to the high-profile status of Rens Kroes, who is the sister of renowned Dutch model Doutzen Kroes. The intertwining of celebrity and serious criminal allegations has kept the story in the headlines, with various outlets reporting on the developments as they unfold.
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's ruling, questions remain regarding the future of Rens and Sid's relationship, as well as the impact of this case on their family. While Rens has not publicly commented on the current status of their relationship since the ruling, sources suggest that she has maintained a strong presence in Sid's life throughout his incarceration.
Legal experts have pointed out that the lengthy duration of the case, which saw multiple appeals and delays, highlights significant issues within the judicial process, particularly concerning cases of sexual violence. The victim's delayed justice and the protracted legal battles have raised concerns about the treatment of such cases in the Dutch legal system.
As Sid S. prepares to serve the remainder of his sentence, the implications of his conviction and the public's reaction to Rens's unwavering support will likely continue to be a topic of discussion. The case serves as a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding issues of consent, victim support, and the societal responses to high-profile criminal cases.
In conclusion, the rejection of Sid S.'s appeal by the Supreme Court marks a definitive end to a protracted legal battle, ensuring that he will remain behind bars for the foreseeable future. The case continues to resonate within the public sphere, prompting dialogues about justice, celebrity influence, and the ongoing challenges faced by survivors of sexual violence.
