Today : May 07, 2025
Politics
12 December 2024

RFK Jr. Advocates For Daughter-in-Law At CIA Over JFK Assassination

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s push for Amaryllis Fox Kennedy aims to reignite investigations surrounding JFK's murder.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is stepping back onto the political stage, but this time he's making headlines not just as the nominee for the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the incoming Trump administration. His latest push centers around the appointment of his daughter-in-law, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, for the role of Deputy Director at the CIA. This move sparks intrigue, especially since it ties deeply to the controversies surrounding the assassination of his uncle, former President John F. Kennedy.

Kennedy Jr., known for his vocal accusations against the CIA concerning the 1963 assassination of JFK, has garnered waves of attention with his assertion. According to sources close to his camp, he believes his daughter-in-law could play a pivotal role in unearthing secrets hidden within the agency, potentially related to the events of those tragic days. Axios reported on this ambitious proposal, igniting discussion about the larger ramifications of such an appointment.

Fox Kennedy, previously an undercover officer with the CIA and also RFK Jr.'s campaign manager, has had her own share of controversy. She penned the book Life Undercover: Coming of Age in the CIA, which detailed her close to ten-year experience within the agency. Interestingly, Fox Kennedy’s memoir sparked quite the debate when she published it without the prior approval of the CIA's vetting team—a rebellious act, which some say could haunt her confirmation chances if the nomination proceeds.

While she's gained some notoriety from her writing, her suitability has raised eyebrows due to her past remarks during interviews. One resurfaced quote from her 2016 interview emphasized listening as the key to disarming adversaries, namely ISIS, which some Republican senators perceive as controversial. This sentiment could pose hurdles during her nomination process, as the Senate deliberates her background and stance on national security.

Meanwhile, Kennedy Jr.’s allegations concerning the CIA’s involvement in not only JFK's assassination but also the murder of his father, Robert F. Kennedy, have remained at the forefront of his advocacy. He has previously claimed the evidence indicating CIA complicity is overwhelming. His conviction resonates with certain factions within the Republican Party, especially under the Trump administration, which seems poised to revisit contentious historical events.

Though President-elect Trump’s administration appears ready to accommodate Kennedy Jr.'s desires—having selected him for HHS—Fox Kennedy's path to the deputy director position is not viewed as straightforward. Axios cited her track record as being fraught with skepticism, yet RFK Jr. and others are optimistic about her potential to shed light on JFK's assassination. His position evidently puts pressure on the incoming administration to engage with historical transparency.

The historical backdrop to all this reveals much: After President Kennedy was assassinated, various conspiracy theories emerged, intertwining the actions of the government and intelligence agencies with the tragedy. These narratives have continued to fuel debates about the extent of government involvement and accountability through the years. Tucker Carlson, among various journalists, has even mentioned alleged connections between the CIA and the assassination, feeding the controversial dialogue to this day.

Fox Kennedy has even weighed in on her feelings about the long-standing issues, mentioning the obligation she personally feels to pursue justice for the events of the 1960s. She has expressed the desire to know if the government had played any role and what measures had been taken to prevent similar occurrences.

For RFK Jr. and others who share his vision, the hopeful appointment of Fox Kennedy seems more than procedural—it’s about justice, closure, and perhaps the ultimate accountability from institutions wielding immense power. The fascination surrounding this potential appointment reflects broader national interests: Will the CIA truly allow roots of its past crimes to be dug up, especially those tied to sacred Kennedy family ties?

Just echoing across the nation, the voices about whether true transparency can duck through the shadows of secrecy remains loud. Whether Fox Kennedy's appointment becomes one of legacy or obscured by the past will be something to watch as the year progresses. The potential nomination not only targets the inquiry of past assassinations but forces the nation to question how comfortably important secrets remain buried under layers of historical significance.