The ongoing legal battle between former Cantabrian President Miguel Ángel Revilla and King Emeritus Juan Carlos I has escalated, drawing significant public attention and sparking a heated debate about accountability and freedom of speech in Spain. On April 3, 2025, Revilla announced that he would be represented by the prominent lawyer José María Fuster-Fabra in response to a lawsuit filed by the King, seeking 50,000 euros for alleged defamatory statements made by Revilla over the past three years.
Juan Carlos I's legal action, initiated by attorney Guadalupe Sánchez Baena, accuses Revilla of damaging the King's honor through remarks that include calling him a "fiscal delinquent" and a "tax evader." Revilla has also made comments regarding the King’s past relationships and labeled him as "corrupt," further fueling the controversy surrounding the lawsuit.
Revilla, known for his outspoken nature, expressed his surprise and discontent at the lawsuit, labeling it as "unfair and petty" that an "inviolable" figure like the King would pursue legal action against an ordinary citizen. He questioned why the King did not target other individuals, such as Bárbara Rey or Corinna Larsen, who have made more serious allegations against him. "Why me?" Revilla pondered, emphasizing that he has not said anything that is not true.
The former president learned about the lawsuit while filming a movie in Vitoria, where he was playing the role of a judge. Initially, he thought it was a hoax until his wife confirmed the news. Revilla stated that he has yet to receive any formal notification regarding the lawsuit but is prepared to face the legal proceedings in ordinary courts, as he is not a member of the protected parliamentary group.
Fuster-Fabra, Revilla's lawyer, is a well-known criminal lawyer in Spain, having handled high-profile cases related to terrorism, corruption, and tax crimes. He is also a vocal critic of Catalan separatism and has received numerous accolades for his work in the legal field. Revilla expressed confidence in Fuster-Fabra, stating that he has been a friend and ally for many years.
In a press conference held shortly after the lawsuit was made public, Revilla reiterated his position, stating, "I have not lied or made anything up," although he acknowledged that his comments about the King have been harsh. He expressed that his disappointment stems from the disparity in how public figures are treated under the law, particularly regarding the King’s immunity. "Being a patriot is not just about waving a flag; it involves paying taxes," he asserted, emphasizing the moral responsibility of leaders.
Revilla's latest book, "Por qué pasa lo que pasa," which discusses corruption and includes critical views on figures like Juan Carlos I, may have spurred the lawsuit. He suggested that the King's legal action could be an attempt to silence dissenting voices and intimidate critics. "This lawsuit is probably aimed at stopping others from speaking out," he remarked.
Despite the legal challenges, Revilla remains resolute in his stance, stating he will defend himself "as an honest citizen" who fulfills his tax obligations. He expressed a desire for the King to attend the conciliation hearing, challenging him to face the allegations directly. "Come to Spain and defend your claim," he urged, indicating a willingness to confront the situation head-on.
The response to the lawsuit has been mixed, with some supporting the King's right to defend his honor, while others view it as an attack on freedom of expression. Carlos Herrera, a personal friend of the King, defended the lawsuit, stating that Juan Carlos I has the right to protect his reputation. He acknowledged that the legal process could be lengthy and complex, but he emphasized the importance of addressing the allegations made against the King.
As the situation unfolds, it raises significant questions about the balance between protecting individual reputations and allowing for critical discourse about public figures. Revilla's case highlights the ongoing tensions in Spanish society regarding accountability, especially for those in positions of power.
Revilla's predicament is further complicated by his past alignment with current Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who he expressed disappointment in for not offering support during this challenging time. "I supported Pedro when he needed it most; a call from him would be appreciated," Revilla lamented, highlighting a perceived lack of solidarity from the government.
As the legal battle progresses, Revilla has decided to limit his public comments on the case, stating that his lawyer will handle all communications moving forward. He remains committed to addressing the issues at hand with seriousness and integrity, reinforcing his belief in the necessity of accountability for all, regardless of their status.
In conclusion, the ongoing lawsuit between Miguel Ángel Revilla and King Emeritus Juan Carlos I serves as a microcosm of broader societal debates about power, accountability, and the responsibilities of public figures in Spain. The outcome of this legal dispute may have lasting implications for how such matters are addressed in the future.
