Since 1941, Mount Rushmore National Memorial has stood as one of America’s most iconic landmarks, showcasing the carved faces of four esteemed presidents: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln. But now, this historical monument may see its legacy altered as Florida Republican Representative Anna Paulina Luna has recently proposed legislation to add the visage of former President Donald Trump to the national tribute.
On January 28, 2025, Luna introduced bill HR 792, which aims to “direct the Secretary of Interior to arrange for the carving of the figure of President Donald J. Trump on Mount Rushmore National Memorial.” This proposition has raised eyebrows and sparked discussion nationally and locally about the significance of such an addition to this treasured site.
According to Luna's office, the motivation behind the proposal is to recognize Trump for his perceived “transformative impact on America” and the achievements attributed to his time as the 45th and 47th president, including enhancements to national security, economic growth, and foreign policy milestones. “Mount Rushmore, a timeless symbol of our nation’s freedom and strength, deserves to reflect his towering legacy,” Luna stated.
While some visitors to Mount Rushmore are enthusiastic about the proposal, claiming it honors Trump’s contributions, others view it as controversial. “I think it’s a very prestigious thing to do,” said one Nebraska woman visiting the site. Conversely, another visitor disagreed, stating, “I appreciate what Donald Trump has done, but he has much more to do. This is a work of art, and I just don’t feel comfortable defacing it by changing it at this point.”
Critics argue adding Trump’s likeness would tarnish the historical significance of the monument. A Nebraska man voiced concerns about the unrest such changes could provoke, noting, “He’s a person who brings so much controversy to everything. I’m afraid it would make it something we wouldn’t celebrate together.”
This sentiment was echoed by other visitors. An Egyptian man, commenting on the cultural and historical value of monuments, compared the action to adding another pyramid atop the great pyramids of Egypt, asking rhetorically, “Why would you?”
The bill was quickly referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources, where it will undergo review. Rama Metkar of The Daily Beast remarked on the previous discussions surrounding Trump’s likeness at Mount Rushmore, recalling conversations the former president had with South Dakota’s then-Governor Kristi Noem back in 2020. Initially perceived as playful banter, these discussions have now transformed somewhat bizarrely and are driving serious legislative scrutiny.
“President Trump’s bold leadership and steadfast dedication to America’s greatness have cemented his place in history,” asserted Luna during her recent remarks, drawing attention to Trump’s supporters and their passion for his legacy.
While Luna’s proposal is gaining traction among certain constituents, it raises significant questions about the preservation of historical narratives within American society. Many locals express deep-rooted concerns over placing Trump's figure alongside those of revered presidents known for their roles in founding and leading the nation.
Opponents of the bill have expressed fears of altering history rather than honoring it. National heritage preservationists warn against making political statements via national monuments, as these places should reflect shared history rather than the divisiveness of contemporary politics.
Supporters of Trump argue the addition would recognize the former president’s contributions as being worthy enough to be counted among the likes of the founding fathers displayed at the monument. “President Trump’s leadership has brought economic resurgence and national security improvements,” Luna echoed the claims of many supporters, highlighting what she calls the transformative effects of his presidency.
Nebraska man expressed apprehension about the decision's long-term repercussions, stating, “It makes one uncomfortable to think of Mount Rushmore being altered. It should remain as it is, holding the four figures who shaped this great nation.”
While the proposal to add Trump to Mount Rushmore remains mired in both enthusiasm and skepticism, it serves as yet another reflection of the deep divisions present within contemporary American politics. Whether the bill will gain traction remains to be seen as it moves through the legislative process.
What is certain is the debate surrounding the proposal will continue, as it echoes broader discussions about identity, recognition, and the representation of leadership within the fabric of American history. With cultural sentiments rapidly shifting, this conversation surrounding Mount Rushmore will undoubtedly provoke more discussion about the notion of legacy and how it is shaped and honored.
“This proposal reflects the current political identity at play, blurring lines between history and politics,” concluded Tikara McClure, capturing the essence of the discussions surrounding the monument.