The Polish presidential election scheduled for May 18, 2025, is shaping up to be remarkably competitive, as recent polling data reveals intriguing shifts in voter support among the leading candidates. Conducted by SW Research for the weekly publication Wprost, the survey indicates major changes in the electoral standings, particularly among the top contenders: Rafał Trzaskowski, Sławomir Mentzen, and Karol Nawrocki.
According to the latest results, Trzaskowski, representing the Koalicja Obywatelska, retains his position as the frontrunner with 33.6% of respondents expressing their intent to vote for him. This reflects a modest increase of 0.7 percentage points compared to previous months, solidifying his status as the favored candidate among Polish voters.
Following Trzaskowski, Sławomir Mentzen of the Konfederacja party has made headlines for his significant surge, now capturing 18.9% support—a remarkable gain of 5.8 percentage points. Mentzen's rise has positioned him above Karol Nawrocki, who is backed by the ruling party, PiS (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość). Nawrocki's approval has decreased slightly to 16.5%, down by 0.5 percentage points from earlier polling.
Mentzen's ascension is particularly notable among younger voters and men, showcasing his ability to connect with demographics dissatisfied with traditional political structures, as well as leveraging social media effectively to boost his campaign visibility. This shift highlights not only the candidates' performances but also changes within voter demographics across Poland.
Observing the data closely, political analysts are pointing to possible causes for these shifts. Dr. Olgierd Annusewicz, commenting on the poll's results, noted, "The data reflects the unpredictable nature of voter sentiment, especially among the digitally engaged youth," adding, "Past engagements and social media campaigns have evidently swayed public opinion to Mentzen's favor."
>
Meanwhile, Szymon Hołownia of the Third Way sits fourth with 7.9% support, as Grzegorz Braun and Krzysztof Stanowski follow closely with 2.9% and 2.8%, respectively. Others such as Adrian Zandberg and Magdalena Biejat are trailing behind with 2.6% and 1.8% support. With nearly 10% of respondents still undecided, the potential for fluctuative shifts remains high as voters finalize their preferences.
The significance of this polling data extends beyond candidate rankings; it also reveals the geographic and demographic nuances influencing electoral competitions. Trzaskowski enjoys considerable support from urban populations, especially women and the over-fifties demographic, whereas Mentzen appeals to younger voters and those residing outside of major cities.
Nawrocki's performance, particularly disappointing among younger voters, raises concerns about his visibility and messaging, prompting PiS strategists to reassess their campaign tactics. An anonymous PiS politician stated, "While we manage our resources carefully, we are mindful of the competition and must engage effectively to retain support."
>
Looking forward to the registration deadlines for candidates on April 4, it is clear the political climate could remain volatile leading up to the elections, with parties like PiS feeling the pressure from rising opposition. With multiple candidates declaring their intention to run, including notable figures like Krzysztof Sitko and Jakub Perkowski, every move counts.
The impact of voter engagement will be pivotal; approximately 71% of eligible voters report they are likely to participate, which could significantly influence the election outcomes. With 1% of respondents indicating they would support alternative candidates and nearly 10% expressing uncertainty about their voting intentions, the focus shifts toward how candidates can mobilize these voters effectively.
Experts indicate this election could redefine Poland’s political alignment, reflecting broader social sentiments and possibly leading to unprecedented electoral outcomes. The dynamics of the race clearly show traction among new voters and discontent within traditional party bases.
With the election date of May 18 drawing near, the sharp political maneuvers observed today will certainly play out beyond polling numbers. Who emerges as the lead candidate will depend on both the candidates’ outreach strategies and their ability to resonate with the electorate on pressing issues. The race is on, and as undecided voters prepare to make their choices, the stakes could not be higher.
Engagement levels and polling results will continue to be computed, as both major parties strategize for impactful campaign periods leading up to the potential second round on June 1, 2025. Political experts remain watchful of how public opinion may guide this historic election.