Today : Apr 16, 2025
Politics
16 April 2025

Pentagon Adviser Dan Caldwell Escorted Out Amid Leak Probe

Caldwell's removal follows investigation into unauthorized disclosures of sensitive information

Dan Caldwell, a senior adviser to U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, was escorted out of the Pentagon on Tuesday, April 15, 2025, amid an ongoing investigation into unauthorized disclosures of sensitive information. This action marks a significant development in a broader crackdown on leaks within the Department of Defense (DOD), which has faced scrutiny for its handling of classified information.

Caldwell, who has a background as a Marine Corps veteran and served in the Iraq War, was placed on administrative leave due to what officials described as "an unauthorized disclosure." The specific details of the material he is accused of leaking remain unclear, as does the identity of the recipients.

The situation escalated following a memo issued by Hegseth’s chief of staff, Joe Kasper, on March 21, 2025, which ordered an investigation into unauthorized disclosures involving sensitive national security information. The memo indicated that polygraph tests could be administered to personnel as part of the inquiry, although it is not confirmed whether Caldwell underwent such a test.

According to a U.S. official who spoke to Reuters on the condition of anonymity, Caldwell's removal is part of a larger effort to address leaks that have plagued the Pentagon and the Trump administration. The investigation was initiated shortly before the Atlantic magazine's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, reported on his inclusion in a Signal messaging chain where top Trump administration officials, including Hegseth, discussed military strikes against the Houthi terror group in Yemen.

In the Signal chat, Caldwell was identified as the best point of contact for conveying plans to the National Security Council. This chat, set up by national security adviser Michael Waltz, included several high-ranking officials, and its revelations have raised concerns about the security of sensitive military discussions.

Hegseth has publicly rebuked the report from Goldberg, asserting, "Nobody was texting war plans, and that's all I have to say about that." National security adviser Mike Waltz also criticized Goldberg, referring to him as the "bottom scum of journalists." These remarks highlight the tension between the Trump administration and the media regarding the handling of national security information.

Caldwell's career has been closely tied to Hegseth, dating back to Hegseth's tenure as head of the Concerned Veterans for America, a nonprofit organization that faced financial difficulties during that period. Caldwell joined CVA in 2013, serving first as policy director and later as executive director.

In addition to his role at CVA, Caldwell has worked as a public policy adviser at Defense Priorities, a Washington-based think tank. His involvement in high-level discussions regarding U.S. military strategy, particularly in relation to Ukraine, has made him a significant figure within the Pentagon.

Despite the serious nature of the allegations against him, Caldwell's ouster is reportedly not connected to a series of high-profile firings that have occurred under Hegseth's leadership. These dismissals included the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the top admiral in the Navy, the head of U.S. Cyber Command, and other senior military lawyers.

The investigation into Caldwell's actions is expected to yield a report that will include a complete record of unauthorized disclosures within the DOD, along with recommendations for improving security measures. Kasper has expressed the expectation that any findings identifying responsible parties will be referred to the appropriate law enforcement entities for potential criminal prosecution.

As the investigation unfolds, there is widespread speculation about the implications of Caldwell's removal for the Trump administration's approach to national security and internal communications. The scrutiny surrounding Caldwell's case reflects broader concerns about the handling of classified information and the potential risks posed by unauthorized disclosures.

In the wake of these developments, public figures and analysts have begun weighing in on the significance of Caldwell's ouster. Paul Rieckhoff, a veteran of the Iraq War and founder of the nonprofit Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, commented on social media, suggesting that "maybe overdue accountability is finally starting after SignalGate." Rieckhoff's remarks underscore the perception that there has been a lack of discipline and accountability within the administration regarding national security matters.

As of now, it remains uncertain how long Caldwell's administrative leave will last or whether he will face any criminal charges as a result of the investigation. The DOD has not commented on ongoing investigations, maintaining a level of secrecy around the specifics of the case.

With national security at the forefront of public discourse, Caldwell's situation serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between transparency and the need to protect sensitive information. As the Pentagon continues to navigate the complexities of internal communications and external scrutiny, the implications of this investigation may resonate far beyond Caldwell's individual case.