A new name has emerged in the investigation by the Public Prosecutor's Office of Pavia into the murder of Chiara Poggi, a 26-year-old woman killed in her home in Garlasco on August 13, 2007. This new lead comes nearly 18 years after the tragic event, which has long haunted the Italian public and media.
The individual in question has reportedly already been interviewed by the Carabinieri, the Italian police force. On Monday morning, April 28, 2025, Daniela Ferrari, the mother of Andrea Sempio—currently the only suspect in the murder—was summoned to the barracks for questioning. According to sources close to the investigation, she suffered a malaise when asked about this new person.
Angela Taccia, Sempio's lawyer, confirmed the existence of this third name during an interview. She accompanied Daniela Ferrari to the barracks as a family friend. "The mother of Andrea told me, 'I don't understand what it has to do with me,' and she went into a panic," Taccia said. After leaving the barracks, Ferrari reportedly did not wish to discuss the matter further and was visibly upset.
The identity of the new individual remains undisclosed, with Taccia stating, "I had never heard his name. I don't know him, nor do Andrea and his father. I don't rule out that his mother knows him, I don't know." This ambiguity has led to speculation about the role this person might play in the ongoing investigation.
In a related development, new fingerprinting of Andrea Sempio has been ordered due to a technical problem with the previous samples. This has raised concerns among Sempio's legal team about the validity of the evidence being gathered against him.
The emergence of this new name has reignited public interest in the Garlasco case, particularly because Alberto Stasi, who was convicted for the murder of Chiara Poggi, is currently serving a 16-year sentence. Stasi's defense lawyer, Antonio De Rensis, commented on the situation, suggesting that the testimony of this third person could potentially undermine Sempio's alibi for the morning of the murder.
During the initial investigation, Sempio claimed he spent the morning at home until 10:00 AM before heading to a bookstore in Vigevano, where he found it closed. He later visited his grandmother and returned home for lunch, providing a parking ticket as proof of his whereabouts. However, the introduction of this new testimony could alter the narrative surrounding that morning.
De Rensis stated, "This testimony could rewrite the history of the receipt from the morning of the crime. I believe the Carabinieri have much more than we can imagine at the moment." His remarks underscore the potential significance of this development in the broader context of the investigation.
Meanwhile, Sempio's defense team has expressed frustration with the procedures being followed by the authorities. Lawyer Massimo Lovati criticized the manner in which the Carabinieri have handled the case, particularly regarding the summons to Ferrari and the request for Sempio to redo his fingerprints. "They could have communicated with us in writing instead of making a phone call. It’s disorganized and raises questions about the integrity of the investigation," Lovati remarked.
As the investigation unfolds, the defense has indicated that they will not cooperate with the Public Prosecutor's Office or the Carabinieri of Milan, citing a lack of trust in their methods. Lovati has promised to contest any evidence collected, stating, "We will counter all requests; there is no longer any type of collaboration, only a fight to the end." This declaration sets the stage for a contentious legal battle as the investigation progresses.
The public has been left wondering about the implications of this new name on the case. The Garlasco murder has remained a point of contention and intrigue, with many questions still unanswered. The involvement of a previously unknown individual adds another layer of complexity to an already convoluted narrative.
As the investigation continues, the focus will likely shift to understanding the relationship between this new person and the existing suspects, as well as what new evidence may emerge as a result of this inquiry. The case is not just a matter of legal proceedings; it represents a quest for truth and justice for Chiara Poggi, whose tragic death has left a lasting impact on her family and the community.
In the coming weeks, further developments are expected, and the legal teams involved will undoubtedly be scrutinizing every detail. The hope remains that clarity can be brought to this long-standing mystery, allowing for justice to be served.
