Michel Friedman, the prominent publicist and former CDU official, has announced his resignation from the party following what he termed as a "catastrophic turning point" for democracy, prompted by the recent votes where the CDU collaborated with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) on migration policy. His departure highlights increasing tensions within the party and raises questions about its political strategies and foundations.
The controversy erupted last Wednesday when the Union faction voted alongside the AfD to approve a resolution concerning stricter migration policies. This unprecedented collaboration has ignited widespread criticism, even among CDU members themselves. Friedman, who has been involved with the CDU since 1983 and served on its national board from 1994 to 1996, expressed his deep discontent with the party’s recent actions.
Friedman, speaking to Hessischer Rundfunk, stated, "For the first time, a democratic party, in this case, my former party CDU, made it possible for the AfD to gain majority support within parliament," calling it "an unforgivable power play." His comments reflect his longstanding fear of normalization between the CDU and the AfD, which he described as opening the "Pandora's box" of right-wing extremism.
The CDU under Friedrich Merz, poised as the main opposition party, now finds itself at the center of this controversy. While Merz has denied intentions to form any coalition with the AfD, the actions taken during the vote have led many to question the CDU's stance on fundamental democratic principles. Friedman underscored this sentiment when he remarked, "The gap between democrats and anti-democrats is important because it offers orientation." He argues the AfD is not merely operating at the edges of democracy but is fundamentally outside of it.
This situation reflects broader concerns about the AfD's influence on German politics, especially as the party has gained traction and acceptance among segments of the population. Recent polls show the AfD with significant support, which many fear could lead to more normalization of extreme right-wing viewpoints within mainstream political discussions.
Friedman, who is of Jewish descent, has long been engaged against anti-Semitism and right-wing extremism. He served as the deputy chairman of the Central Council of Jews in Germany from 2000 to 2003, establishing himself as a prominent figure advocating for democratic values. His decision to leave the CDU is seen as both personal and political, echoing his fears about the direction of German politics.
During his time within the party, Friedman was vocal against the rise of right-wing populism and consistently pointed out the dangers posed by the AfD. He labeled the AfD as "ideological arsonists" and made statements expressing his grave concern over their electoral gains. He reiterated this sentiment during the commemoration for the victims of National Socialism, critiquing the notion of democracy being represented by those who dismiss certain groups as unworthy of consideration.
Friedman's resignation has prompted discussions within the CDU and among political analysts about the potential ramifications for the party. CDU leaders, including Merz, face pressure from both party members and the public to clarify their stance and distance themselves from extreme right parties. This includes vocal criticisms from former Chancellor Angela Merkel, who stated it was incorrect to enable the AfD's influence in the Bundestag.
Political opponents from parties such as the SPD and the Greens have labeled this incident as a dangerous departure from democratic norms. Current CDU politicians have been urged to reflect on the party's future and its commitment to democratic ideals, particularly following the backlash from the vote.
Friedman's resignation marks not just his withdrawal from the CDU but could also signify the start of broader ideological rifts within the party as it grapples with its identity amid shifting political landscapes. The challenge for the CDU remains as they proceed with key legislative decisions, including the controversial bill on migration policies.
Following Friedman's announcement, protests erupted outside the CDU headquarters, where critics voiced their opposition to the party's collaboration with the AfD. They expressed fears about losing democratic principles and the potential normalization of extremist views. This outcome raises questions about how many others may follow suit, reflecting broader discontent among party members and German citizens alike.
Friedman now steps back from the political scene he has been part of for decades, urging all democrats to remain vigilant against forces he believes threaten the fundamental values of the Republic. His departure puts the spotlight on the CDU and its leadership, urging them to reconsider their paths as elections draw nearer.
With political tensions at this high, the CDU will need to respond decisively to restore confidence among its members and the broader electorate as they approach the impending elections.