Today : Mar 04, 2025
U.S. News
03 March 2025

Michel Cymes Takes Legal Action Against Cyril Hanouna

The doctor responds to insults from the television host with lawsuits and defiance

Michel Cymes, the well-known French doctor and television presenter, has ignited considerable controversy by filing two lawsuits against Cyril Hanouna, the notorious host of Touche pas à mon poste (TPMP). The legal action stems from Hanouna's derogatory comments about Cymes, which he made during his shows. The feud, reflective of longstanding tensions between the two television figures, has now escalated to the courts.

The conflict flared up around mid-February 2025 when Cymes expressed his views on the controversial closure of C8, the channel where Hanouna hosts his popular show. On France 5's C Médiatique, Cymes stated his lack of sympathy for Hanouna, who he accused of perpetuating years of insults. "Je ne vais pas m’apitoyer sur le sort d’un type qui m’a insulté pendant des années dans son émission," he remarked, highlighting his contempt for Hanouna's behavior. This comment struck a nerve and prompted Hanouna to launch his own verbal attack.

On February 17, during broadcasts on Europe 1 and TPMP, Hanouna retaliated with harsh criticisms, labeling Cymes as "un véritable abruti" and questioning his qualifications as both a doctor and television host. He remembered previous statements made by Cymes during the pandemic, mocking the doctor's credibility by referencing his past comments, where Cymes had downplayed COVID-19's threats. "Michel Cymes, ce n'est pas le monsieur qui avait dit que le Covid était une 'grippette'?" Hanouna exclaimed, demonstrating his disdain for Cymes's professional background.

Unfazed externally but clearly bothered by the incident, Cymes decided to take legal matters seriously. His initial response included asserting his right to dignity and respect, stating, "Me faire traiter d’abruti par Hanouna, c’est comme si Zidane me disait que je joue bien au ballon. C’est une véritable consécration." He underscored how someone of Hanouna's ilk could not impact him personally but expressed concern about the broader ramifications of Hanouna's conduct.

The lawsuits currently being prepared by Cymes include charges of "injuries" against Hanouna and claims against Europe 1 and C8, the networks broadcasting Hanouna's remarks. This legal maneuver is seen as Cymes's attempt to not only avenge his reputation but also reflect the frustrations of many unnamed colleagues within the media industry. "J’ai le sentiment de faire aujourd’hui ce que l’énorme majorité du PAF aurait aimé faire," Cymes shared, pointing out how many within the television industry feel too intimidated to challenge Hanouna openly.

Cymès has openly called out the culture of fear enveloping many media professionals who work alongside Hanouna. According to him, the insecurity felt by his peers only amplifies the issue, stating, "Les gens ont peur de Cyril Hanouna. Ils ont peur, vraiment." He believes his actions represent those hesitant to speak up for fear of public humiliation on Hanouna's platform.

The defendant, Hanouna, has not hesitated to escalate his commentary, confidently asserting on Europe 1, "Michel, franchement, tu te ridiculises. Arrête. Va réviser ton internat because c'est plus possible!" His dismissive attitude suggests he feels little concern for the impending legal confrontation, downplaying Cymes’ grievances as melodramatic.

While the public awaits the developments of these lawsuits, it’s key to reflect on how this feud highlights significant issues within the French media panorama. The dynamic between these two vents not only individual grievances but also larger discussions about free speech, personal integrity, and accountability among media personalities.

Hanouna's reputation as a provocateur cannot be understated; he has long claimed to perform as the voice of unfiltered commentary within the entertainment sector. Yet as his actions start to lead to legal complications, questions arise about the possible consequences of his unchecked behavior and the expectations placed on television personalities. This conflict may very well set precedence for how public figures navigate insults and disagreements— which, as both parties know too well, can severely impact one's career and public persona.

Looking to the future, it will be intriguing to monitor how this high-profile legal battle transpires and if it prompts similar actions among others within the industry. One thing is clear: the rivalry between Michel Cymes and Cyril Hanouna has captured public attention, mirrored by the expansive reach and impact of their respective platforms.