Former Chancellor Angela Merkel has sharply criticized Friedrich Merz, the current leader of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), for his controversial decision to rely on far-right support to pass legislation aimed at tightening immigration controls. This marked the first time since World War II a mainstream political party leaned on the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) to achieve a parliamentary majority, igniting widespread backlash as Germany prepares for national elections on February 23, 2025.
Merkel's criticism came through an open letter released Thursday, where she condemned Merz's move as 'wrong', highlighting the potential dangers of enabling the AfD’s influence within the Bundestag. She reminded him of his previous commitment to avoid collaboration with the far-right party. 'It’s wrong to no longer feel bound by this proposal and, for the first time, to allow a majority with the votes of the AfD,' she stated, emphasizing the historic ramifications of such cooperation.
The contentious resolution, which Merz pushed through parliament on Wednesday, sought to implement stricter immigration controls and expedite deportations. Although non-binding, it passed with support from the AfD, stirring outrage from not only Merkel but also other prominent figures, including Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who denounced the decision as 'an inexcusable mistake.'
Scholz, leading the Social Democrats, criticized the coalition with the AfD as a breach of the longstanding political consensus against far-right collaboration. He asserted, 'Since the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany, there has always been a clear consensus among all democrats: We do not make common cause with the far right.'
The political balance has shifted dramatically since the AfD first became the first far-right party to win state elections last year. Polls currently position the CDU at around 30%, followed closely by the AfD at 20%, marking significant gains for the latter amid rising anti-immigrant sentiment. Merz defends his approach by citing public fears following recent attacks linked to asylum seekers, including a knife attack last week by a rejected Afghan asylum seeker.
Despite Merkel’s intervention, Merz remains adamant about his strategy. 'A correct decision doesn't become wrong because the wrong people approve it,' he asserted, attempting to frame his actions as pragmatic responses to urgent public safety concerns. His comments suggest high stakes as he seeks to portray the CDU as decisive on immigration, intending to draw voters away from the AfD.
Polls indicate increasing polarization, with many former CDU supporters expressing doubts over Merz’s commitment to traditional party values. Analysts caution this shift could alienate moderate voters, possibly pushing them toward AfD or contributing to discontent within the CDU.
The backlash has been intense, with thousands protesting outside CDU headquarters, expressing fear over the perceived legitimacy of far-right policies infiltrated by mainstream politics. Many have echoed sentiments of regret for the long-standing 'firewall' meant to keep parties like the AfD out of formal politics. CDU General Secretary Carsten Linnemann defended Merz, recalling past decisions and the need to address contemporary political challenges.
Merkel’s public criticism is particularly noteworthy as she typically maintains a low profile following her chancellorship, rarely intervening directly in political matters. Her condemnation not only reveals internal party tensions but also raises questions about the future of the CDU under Merz’s leadership.
Next steps include the CDU’s plans to present a binding bill aimed at restricting asylum rights and revising family reunion policies for migrants. This legislation may also require AfD votes to pass, potentially entrenching their role within the legislative process.
With the February elections approaching, political analysts are closely observing how this controversy will influence voter sentiment and coalition-building prospects. The CDU's future alignment with either the left-leaning parties or the AfD remains uncertain, complicative efforts for Merz, who must navigate the fine line between addressing security concerns and maintaining the party's historical commitment to democratic values.
Public sentiment is deeply divided, with some viewing Merz’s calculated move as necessary action against rising crime and migration pressures, and others perceiving it as capitulation to extremist ideologies. The outcome of this delicate political maneuvering will not only determine the fate of the CDU but could also reshape the political fabric of postwar Germany.