Megyn Kelly has found herself entangled in controversy after blasting the Philadelphia Eagles for allegedly bypassing the traditional visit to the White House following their Super Bowl victory. The criticism unfolded on social media, sparking reactions from fans and commentators alike.
The Eagles, who triumphed with a score of 40-22 against the Kansas City Chiefs on February 9, 2025, faced backlash from the former Fox News host. Kelly expressed her disapproval after reports emerged, citing unnamed sources claiming the team had no intention of visiting President Donald Trump. On February 24, 2025, Kelly posted on social media platform X, saying, "Could be (hopefully?) fake news!" This comment followed her previous harsh remarks directed at the team, where she labeled their actions as insulting to the president.
Kelly's engagement on X revealed the depth of her sentiment, illustrated by her sharp reply to another user, who lamented about the Eagles' stance on Trump. "SAME. GO F YOURSELVES EAGLES. My husband is a fan so I got onboard but F this BS," she wrote, expressing her frustration explicitly. This sparked mixed reactions from the online community.
Some X users supported Kelly, with one replying, "Well Megyn, you are NOT out of bounds here. Let the Eagles come out, and put an end to this question once, and for all!" Others, concerned about the potential fallout, expressed their conditional love for the team, indicating their distress over the alleged invitation snub. Another user expressed, "I was about to throw my whole gear away over this," reflecting the emotional stakes among fans.
Despite the uproar, it was later reported by The U.S. Sun, citing a well-placed insider, the Eagles had no firm invitation from the White House at all. The source conveyed, "We focus on the game for now, but if we win the Super Bowl, we wouldn’t go to the White House," encapsulating the team's focus amid the celebrations.
This mix of speculation and public sentiment showcased the broader frictions between sports, politics, and the expectations of fandom. Kelly's vehement reaction highlights how athletes' choices can evoke strong feelings among fans, particularly when tied to political figures like Trump. The significance of such interactions poses questions about athletes' roles as public figures and their responsibilities toward different segments of their fan base.
The conversation continues as the Eagles navigate the aftermath of their championship success and the public relations dynamics involved with their decisions around political engagements. How will the team address these polarizing sentiments, and what measures might they take to unite fans during this divisive moment? Only time will tell.