Pisa, March 3, 2025 - The proposed redevelopment of the area near the Apes village on Via di Goletta has sparked significant opposition from local environmental groups, particularly Legambiente Pisa and the Committee for the Defense of Trees Pisa. While both organizations applaud the intention to create a children's playground, they are strongly against the construction of a parking lot, which is planned to accommodate 37 vehicles right next to the playground.
This controversial project, initiated by Pisamo, was approved last November and aims to convert what is currently enclosed spontaneous green space. The environmentalists express concern not only about the aesthetics of such developments but about the pressing issues tied to the area’s hydrogeological integrity. "The chosen area for the parking is spontaneous green space which acts as a sponge for rainfall. To impermeabilize it would increase flooding risks..." said representatives from Legambiente Pisa.
San Giusto is known for its susceptibility to flooding, and the activists worry the sheltered area might exacerbate already significant drainage issues. They argue there's no current necessity for additional parking, as existing blue parking spaces already meet demand, often remaining vacant during the day. "If more parking were needed, the Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan identifies railway areas already intended for this purpose..." stated the committee's representatives, highlighting alternative solutions the city could explore instead.
Discussions with local residents reveal strong community sentiment against the proposed parking lot. The residents reportedly prefer using the area as dog-walking space rather than additional parking. "Residents expressed the desire to use the area not for parking, but for adequately sized dog-walking space separated from the children's park..." noted the local associations involved.
The environmental organizations have conducted thorough evaluations of local parking needs and have also engaged with citizens to gather feedback. They assert the necessity of creating safe, enjoyable spaces for both children and pets to coexist harmoniously, rather than cramming both functions together as proposed, which they claim would compromise the quality of life and safety within the neighborhood.
Both groups are calling for the City of Pisa to present the executive project to citizens for greater clarity and involvement. They urge reconsideration of the plan surrounding parking arrangements and to pivot toward addressing pressing local demands, such as creating sufficient dog-walking facilities adequately distanced from the playground. There exists shared community interest for enhancements supported by meaningful, sustainable community planning practices.
Activists contend benefits of such adjustments extend beyond recreational advantages. Transforming the proposed parking area could address public health concerns, improve biodiversity by providing habitats, and even mitigate the flood risks cited through community consultations. This change reflects the community-backed vision for environmentally conscious development, striving for open green spaces instead of concrete lots.
Opposition continues to mount with increasing calls for action from residents and environmental activists alike, threatening to escalate their protests if their voices are not adequately represented and considered. With local apprehensions building, community members are prepared to rally and organize, ensuring sustainability remains at the forefront of urban development decisions.