The Kosovo government recently made significant changes aimed at addressing allegations of election interference, particularly targeting certain social work centers suspected of manipulating the electoral process. On February 21, 2025, Minister of Justice Albena Hajiu announced the closure of these centers, which had been operating under the authority of Serbia, citing concerns over their influence on the outcomes of the recent elections for the Kosovo Assembly.
During a press briefing following discussions among government officials, Hajiu stated, "We bear responsibility under the law, the Constitution, and citizens to provide fair elections and just electoral competition." This remark highlights the government’s dedication to ensuring electoral integrity, especially amid accusations of interference from Serbian institutions.
These closures stemmed from investigations indicating roles played by officials from the social work centers, particularly those located in northern Kosovo, where Serbian authority remains strong. Reports emerged earlier about centers coercing citizens to vote for specific political parties under the threat of losing social benefits. Allegations surfaced after four employees were arrested following evidence they had pressured residents effectively, offering social assistance only if recipients supported certain candidates.
Hajiu's actions aligned with the sentiments expressed by the EU Election Monitoring Mission, which has confirmed instances of Serbian interference during elections. She addressed the press, stating, "There are suspicions these centers were tools of interference, hence our legal and institutional responses." The urgency of the situation was reflected when the closures prompted swift reactions from various international entities.
After the closures, negative feedback emerged from the US Embassy, which expressed concern over the abrupt nature of the government's actions. They warned, "The closure of these centers may have negative consequences for Kosovo's future relations with Europe.” Multiple agencies, including the OSCE and Germany's diplomatic representations, voiced similar apprehensions, urging caution.
Hajiu asserted to the media, “Relations with our international partners, as well as our citizens, have not been disrupted.” She emphasized the legality of her ministry's actions, noting they were not intended against international stakeholders but rather aimed at safeguarding electoral fairness. Despite her reassurances, local judiciary representatives later confirmed criticisms, stating the closure had occurred without court orders, leading to concerns over the legality process.
On the same day as the social services closure, authorities were actively engaged in apprehending another individual, identified as BG from Podujevo, who was arrested under uncommunicated circumstances by Montenegrin police. Reports indicate BG may be extradited to Serbia based on warrants issued by the Serbian government, underscoring the intertwined nature of law enforcement operations across borders.
The situation raises questions not only about the integrity of democratic processes within Kosovo but also how external pressures and internal governance intersect, influencing public perception and international relations. With serious allegations surfacing just after elections, Kosovo's government faces mounting pressure to navigate these turbulent waters delicately.
The conflicts and controversies surrounding the recent elections underline the fragility of Kosovo's political climate. With these developments, the government seems to be trying to consolidate its authority and credibility as it moves forward. Hajiu's insistence on adhering to the law and the Constitution signifies the administration's determination to uphold democratic principles, even as conflicting interests loom over its actions. The coming months will reveal how these decisions impact both local and international standing, and whether the country can stabilize amid pressures from both internal factions and external watchdogs.
All eyes will remain on the Kosovar authorities as they deal with the legacy of these closures and interfere with electoral challenges. The resolution of these issues could lead to significant changes not only within the political arena of Kosovo but also in its relationships with neighbors, especially Serbia and broader international entities, as it seeks greater legitimacy and acceptance in the complex Balkans region.