The Israeli government made a significant move on March 19, 2025, by reappointing Itamar Ben-Gvir, the controversial leader of the far-right Otzma Yehudit party, to his previous role as National Security Minister. This decision comes after Ben-Gvir resigned two months ago in protest of a ceasefire deal with Hamas. The cabinet's unanimous approval in favor of his return solidifies the coalition's grip, ahead of a vital budget vote this month.
Ben-Gvir's reappointment, which was made despite legal objections from the Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, underscores the tensions between the coalition led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel's legal system. The attorney general warned that Ben-Gvir could not hold the position due to ongoing allegations against him concerning illegal involvement in operational matters.
During the Knesset session, which saw 65 votes in favor of Ben-Gvir's reinstatement against 46 opposed, lawmakers from the coalition celebrated, while opposition members protested and walked out. This bipartisan reaction reflects the controversial nature of Ben-Gvir's politics, particularly his assertive stance on security issues, including themes of military action in Gaza, plans for the relocation of Palestinian populations, and strengthening the police force.
Following his reinstatement, Ben-Gvir stated, “I am resuming my leadership of the National Security Ministry. There is much work ahead, and I will continue implementing my policies in the Israel Police and prison service.” His remarks highlight a commitment to maintaining strong security policies within Israel, particularly amid ongoing conflict in Gaza.
The reappointment has increased the coalition's majority in the Knesset to 68 seats, greatly boosting their ability to pass the upcoming budget, crucial for the government’s stability until the next elections scheduled for October 2026.
This political maneuver comes at a time of heightened military actions in Gaza. Reports indicate a renewed offensive by Israel, which has included strikes aimed at Hamas leaders and infrastructure. Ben-Gvir's return to the cabinet is closely linked to these military escalations, as he had previously stated he would only return if military operations recommenced.
Ben-Gvir had originally left the coalition due to dissatisfaction with a ceasefire agreement and a deal involving hostages. His party's return has overshadowed significant concerns regarding the legal implications of his approach and governance style, which some argue borders on authoritarian.
In the wake of Ben-Gvir's return, coalition members have denounced legal challenges against his appointment. Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi criticized the Attorney General, accusing her of trying to control the government’s actions. As tensions mount, there are expectations of multiple legal petitions against Ben-Gvir's role as they seek review by the High Court of Justice, which has a hearing scheduled for April 7, 2025.
Advocacy groups, including NGO Ima Era, expressed strong concerns about Ben-Gvir's conduct. They argue that his actions could expose children and the population to significant risks, stressing that a government’s decision during wartime should not bypass legal protocols or substantial discussion.
Opposition to the cabinet's decision remains robust, with leaders warning that the atmosphere around Ben-Gvir's governance is reminiscent of “dark regimes rather than a democracy.” This perspective was echoed by comments from various opposition leaders who have vowed to uphold legal challenges in response to decisions they view as undermining democratic principles.
The backdrop of these political developments is a fragmented coalition struggling to unite differing factions while facing severe external pressure, notably from ultra-Orthodox lawmakers threatening to derail budget proposals. The return of Otzma Yehudit and its impact on future policy direction underscores ongoing debates over acceptable political conduct and the role of legality in governance.
As political analysts note, the dynamics of the current Knesset suggest a complex interplay between law, governance, and public sentiment as Israel grapples with both internal disputes and external conflicts. The future of Ben-Gvir's policies and their implications for Israel's political landscape remain uncertain as the date of crucial legislative decisions approaches.
