In a striking testament to the possibilities of modern longevity science, entrepreneur Max Guerois has claimed significant personal health improvements after following the rigorous Blueprint Protocol established by Bryan Johnson, a millionaire known for his aggressive anti-aging strategies. After nearly two years adhering to this program, Guerois reports a remarkable reversal of his biological age from 28 to 18, a change he attributes to his transformed lifestyle centered on nutrition, exercise, and sleep.
In a post shared on X (formerly Twitter), Guerois shared his journey, outlining the dietary and lifestyle changes he enacted to attain these results. He wrote, “Almost 2 years on @bryan_johnson's Blueprint: in 2023: always tired, carb-loading, night owl habits. In 2024: turned things around, focused on health & longevity. 2025: 10 YEARS YOUNGER biologically (18 vs 28) with 90% of all biomarkers in optimal ranges.”
Before joining the Blueprint lifestyle in 2023, Guerois described feelings of fatigue, unhealthy eating, and erratic sleeping patterns. By the following year, he implemented significant changes aimed at improving his health. In 2025, he now claims that over 90% of his health markers, such as cholesterol and blood sugar levels, fall within optimal ranges—a sign of his improved health.
Guerois emphasized three key lessons learned during his journey: the importance of nutrition, sleep, and exercise, which he believes should come before investing in expensive supplements. He noted the vital necessity of tracking progress, stating, “You can only improve what you measure.” Furthermore, he stressed the importance of social support, advising to “surround yourself with friends for accountability” to maintain motivation.
However, the protocol has not come without its challenges. Guerois candidly revealed some downsides of following the Blueprint. He cites reduced social flexibility as a significant issue, particularly during late-night outings or dinners. “Time investment for tracking is real,” he stated, highlighting the effort required to maintain adherence to the program. He also mentioned the application of the 80/20 rule, allowing a flexible approach rather than strict compliance, stating, “perfect adherence isn’t sustainable.”
The online community reacted with a mix of admiration and skepticism to Guerois' achievements. Some applauded his dedication and success, while others expressed doubts regarding the practicality of Johnson’s Blueprint Protocol, questioning the approach's accessibility for average individuals. Comments ranged from encouragement to skepticism, as some people sought advice on how to incorporate such routines into their everyday lives.
According to the official Blueprint website, the program is an evidence-based approach designed around diet, exercise, sleep, and skincare. It labels Bryan Johnson as “the healthiest human on the planet,” due to his four-year commitment to adherence to the protocol. The website claims that participants can see improvements in physical strength, focus, energy levels, heart health, and overall mood by following the regimen.
Guerois’ journey brings forth important conversations about the future of longevity science and whether such detailed routines can be practical for the wider population. The Blueprint Approach is particularly attention-grabbing but raises questions about its feasibility in daily life. Johnson also delved into broader conversations surrounding humanity's future, having introduced a philosophy called “Don’t Die” earlier this month—a proposition that seeks to align advancements in artificial intelligence with human longevity efforts.
The Blueprint journey poses philosophical questions about how we view health, aging, and the lengths some are willing to go in pursuit of longevity. Guerois serves as both a participant and a case study in how individual approaches to health can vary widely, even within the same program. While some advocate strict adherence, Guerois has learned the value of balance and flexibility, a lesson that may resonate with many.
Ultimately, as the interest in longevity science continues to swell, it remains essential to understand both the promised advantages and the potential practical drawbacks associated with such extreme health protocols.
