Conor McGregor, the world-renowned mixed martial arts (MMA) fighter, has been ordered by the Irish High Court to cover the legal costs associated with the civil lawsuit brought against him by Nikita Hand. This ruling follows the jury's conclusion, which found McGregor liable for the rape of Hand at a Dublin hotel back in 2018.
On Thursday, Justice Alexander Owens mandated McGregor to pay the costs incurred by Hand, who was awarded nearly €250,000 (approximately $258,440) after the three-week trial concluded last month. The financial burden from legal fees could amount to around €1 million (about $1.05 million), as reported by the Irish Times.
During the proceedings, it was revealed attractivelegal expenses would be borne by McGregor for both Hand and his co-defendant James Lawrence, who faced accusations alongside him but was not found liable. The judge remarked on the uniqueness of the case, noting how both defendants presented their defense almost identically, leading to the jury's belief they had concocted their narrative.
Mr. Justice Owens expressed concern over McGregor's behavior during and after the trial, highlighting instances of public outcry on social media where McGregor described the court proceedings as akin to being part of a “kangaroo court.” Hand's attorney, John Gordon, argued these posts represented direct insults to the jury, directly undermining the integrity of the legal process.
Despite these allegations, McGregor's attorney, Remy Farrell, countered claims for high costs, asserting standard procedures should apply without additional discretion. Farrell contended the court should not act as the 13th juror.
The judge, highlighting McGregor’s wealth, commented on how any penalties incurred from possible contempt charges would likely be inconsequential for the fight promoter. He expressed his displeasure at McGregor’s attack on the jury and noted it as “highly irresponsible.”
The recent ruling adds yet another chapter to McGregor’s struggles following the trial. After settling, his business associates, including Proximo Spirits, distanced themselves from him, terminating ties with his whiskey brand, Proper No. 12. Proximo made it clear McGregor would no longer represent the brand nor share ownership.
Following the jury's verdict, McGregor issued statements asserting his intention to appeal. He lamented over personal failings too but maintained his position, labeling the experience consensual. “I have instructed my legal team to appeal the decision,” he stated firmly.
With the judge's ruling expected on Thursday afternoon, the outcome of McGregor's obligations remains to be finalized. It raises significant questions not only about McGregor’s future but also about the broader repercussions of high-profile legal battles of this nature.
The case serves as both a reminder of the serious ramifications of accusations of sexual assault and the processes of civil law as it continues to evolve alongside societal attitudes toward accountability and justice.