In a legal dispute that has captured public attention, Clizia Incorvaia, a well-known influencer and the wife of television host Paolo Ciavarro, is set to stand trial for allegedly violating the privacy rights of her daughter, Nina, from a previous relationship with singer Francesco Sarcina of the band Le Vibrazioni. The trial is scheduled for mid-December 2025.
The controversy began when Sarcina filed complaints against Incorvaia, claiming that she had shared photos of their now 9-year-old daughter on social media for commercial purposes without his consent. According to reports, Sarcina became aware of these posts about a year ago and argued that their post-divorce agreement specifically prohibited Incorvaia from involving their daughter in any commercial agreements.
Incorvaia is accused of using her daughter’s image to promote various brands of children’s clothing and shoes, allegedly publishing at least five posts on Instagram that featured Nina. Prosecutor Alessia Miele stated that these actions were taken “to profit for herself and others” and were done without the necessary authorization from Sarcina.
Incorvaia has been vocal about her stance on the matter, reportedly responding to Sarcina via text message by saying, "With the money I earn from fashion brands, I pay for her school, clothes, and more." This admission has become a pivotal point in the case, as it suggests a direct link between her financial gain and the use of their child's image.
On social media, Incorvaia defended her actions, asserting that children should be kept out of parental disputes. She wrote, "When a couple ends, children should be left out. Good parents should know this and find an agreement." This statement reflects her belief that parental conflicts should not involve their children.
Incorvaia's comments came in light of Sarcina's accusations, which he claims were part of a broader pattern of behavior that disregarded their daughter’s privacy. The singer has expressed concerns about the implications of such exposure on a child, emphasizing the need for boundaries in social media usage.
As the case unfolds, it highlights the growing debate over the ethics of sharing children’s images online, particularly by public figures. Many parents grapple with similar dilemmas, balancing their professional lives with the protection of their children’s privacy.
Furthermore, the situation has drawn attention to the responsibilities of influencers, who often navigate complex relationships with their audiences and personal lives. Incorvaia, who is also the daughter-in-law of the late actress Eleonora Giorgi, has found herself at the center of this controversy, which has implications not just for her but for the influencer community at large.
Incorvaia's relationship with Sarcina has been under scrutiny since their separation, with allegations of betrayal and disputes over their daughter's upbringing surfacing in public discussions. In a recent social media post, Incorvaia clarified that her marriage did not end due to any supposed infidelity on her part, aiming to dispel rumors that have persisted since their split.
As the trial approaches, both parties are preparing for what could be a lengthy legal battle. Sarcina’s legal team is expected to present evidence of the alleged privacy violations, while Incorvaia will likely continue to assert her right to use her daughter’s image for professional purposes.
This case serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding family dynamics in the public eye, particularly as social media continues to evolve. The outcome may set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future, especially regarding the rights of children in the digital age.
Public reaction to the case has been mixed, with some supporting Incorvaia’s right to earn a living while others argue for the protection of children’s privacy. The court’s decision may not only impact the lives of those directly involved but could also influence broader societal views on the intersection of parenting and social media.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the conversation surrounding the ethical implications of sharing children’s images online is likely to continue, with many watching closely to see how the courts navigate these challenging issues.
