Today : Mar 19, 2025
Business
19 March 2025

Australian Court Fines Active Super A$10.5 Million For Greenwashing

The ruling showcases the ongoing battle against misleading ESG claims in the financial sector.

In a landmark ruling, Australia’s Federal Court has imposed a penalty of A$10.5 million (USD$6.7 million) on Active Super trustee LGSS for engaging in practices characterized as greenwashing. This initiative highlights ongoing scrutiny over misleading claims related to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investment criteria.

The ruling stems from litigation filed by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in 2023, which contended that Active Super had not adhered to the very ESG standards it promoted. From 2021 through 2023, the fund allegedly made investments that it claimed to have eliminated based on its commitment to socially responsible investing, including sectors such as gambling, coal mining, oil tar sands, and Russian assets following the invasion of Ukraine.

In June 2024, Justice O’Callaghan of the Federal Court affirmed that Active Super had misled its investors by continuing to hold securities in companies such as Skycity Entertainment Group, tobacco manufacturer Amcor, and Russian oil giants Gazprom and Rosneft. Justice O’Callaghan emphasized that LGSS had, in fact, reaped benefits by misrepresenting the ethical nature of a substantial portion of its investments. He remarked, "LGSS benefited from its misleading conduct by misrepresenting the 'ethical' nature of a significant part of its investments, which on any view enhanced its ability to attract investors to the Active Super fund." This assertion underscores the court’s finding that the misleading claims not only tarnished the firm’s integrity but also deprived its clients of the opportunity to invest in alignment with their values.

The court announced the penalty on March 18, 2025, a significant move in a series of actions aimed at curbing unethical practices among investment firms in Australia. ASIC has recently been proactive, with this case marking its third courtroom victory against misleading marketing practices associated with greenwashing. ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court remarked that this ruling showcases the agency's commitment to addressing misleading claims made by entities in the financial services sector: "This case demonstrates ASIC’s commitment to taking on misleading marketing and greenwashing claims made by companies promoting financial services." She assured that ASIC would continue its vigilant oversight of greenwashing activities.

In response to the penalty, LGSS has indicated it is reviewing the judgment and considering its options. The trustee acknowledged its past mistakes, apologizing for the misleading claims and pledging to amend its compliance systems to prevent similar issues in the future.

This case echoes a growing trend in the financial industry, where regulators are now focusing on accountability against firms making hollow claims about their ethical investment practices. Just recently, Vanguard Investments Australia faced penalties amounting to A$12.9 million, while Mercer Superannuation was fined A$11.3 million for similar transgressions. This trend indicates a broader regulatory effort to push financial entities to align their investments with their advertised ethical standards.

The implications of this ruling extend beyond just Active Super and LGSS; it serves as a cautionary tale for the entire financial services landscape in Australia and beyond. Investors are increasingly concerned about the authenticity of ESG claims, as they seek to align their portfolios with their personal ethics and social responsibility.

As global investors continue to push for transparency and accountability in ESG investing, the recent court rulings present a signal that misleading practices will not be tolerated. The judicial system is actively reinforcing the notion that funds must substantiate their ethical claims and genuinely reflect their investing principles.

In today’s world, where investment decisions are increasingly influenced by social and environmental factors, the stakes are higher than ever for fund managers. The financial sector must now grapple with the dual responsibility of achieving returns while maintaining credibility in their market position. In this evolving landscape, transparency and integrity will become pivotal for retaining investor confidence.