Today : Feb 05, 2025
Technology
05 February 2025

Apple's New Invites App Sparks Controversy Over Copycat Claims

Developers accuse Apple of violating its guidelines on copycat apps with the launch of Invites, reminiscent of Partiful.

Apple Inc. recently introduced its new app, Invites, allowing users to create personalized event invitations and share them with friends and family. While the concept might seem innovative for Apple, it has stirred controversy among developers, particularly those behind well-known event planning app, Partiful.

Partiful took to social media to air its grievances, sharing a screenshot of the App Store Review Guidelines' rule 4.1(a) which addresses concerns about copycat apps. The guideline suggests, “Come up with your own ideas. We know you have them, so make yours come to life. Don’t simply copy the latest popular app on the App Store, or make some minor changes to another app’s name or UI and pass it off as your own.”

The developers of Partiful argue this policy is being directly flouted by Apple’s new offering, asserting the Invites app bears remarkable similarities to their own platform, which aims to allow users to send customized event invitations. They especially point out key distinctions, such as Partiful’s more versatile cross-platform functionality, which permits invitations to be sent without requiring users to provide email addresses for confirmation.

Apple's Invites app, on the other hand, mandates users to enter their email addresses for RSVP, tying the functionality to the iCloud+ subscription service. This setup means users must pay to enjoy full access to event creation, as subscriptions start at $0.99 per month. A direct comparison shows Partiful’s business model is considerably more accessible, attracting users with its free to use structure.

The issue at hand goes beyond just the launch of one new app. It revisits the longstanding practice known as “sherlocking,” named after Apple’s past actions where it enhanced its native applications with features pilfered from third-party apps. This time, the term came back to haunt Apple as critics noted the stark resemblance between Invites and Partiful's established service.

The history of “sherlocking” ties back to the introduction of Apple’s Sherlock 3 app which overshadowed the Watson application developed by Daniil A. Andronov. After the release of Sherlock 3, Watson was quickly rendered irrelevant due to Apple’s similar feature set, leading many developers to feel as though Apple had unfairly used their innovative ideas without acknowledgment.

The similarities between Apple Invites and Partiful caught the attention of Marissa Mayer, founder of the Sunshine app and former CEO of Yahoo, who also chimed in via social media. "At @sunshine, we also took a look at these guidelines today. Gen AI invites and integrated photo sharing, hmm…" she tweeted, highlighting the tensions within the developer community as Apple continues to set benchmarks through its app release strategies.

Despite these accusations and concerns, Apple's track record suggests it is unlikely to reverse course. The iPhone maker has capitalized on its ecosystem, leading users to gravitate naturally toward its offerings, regardless of competing alternatives. The convenience of integrating services like Photos and Apple Music within Invites presents immediate advantages for users, potentially overshadowing the claims made by developers like Partiful.

Users who have embraced Partiful have praised it not only for its unique features but also its commitment to ease of use. The app has been popular among individuals planning events, providing customizable tools and user-friendly interfaces not dependent on additional subscriptions. Critics argue this accessibility is what makes it stand apart from Apple’s app, which, even though available for free, might require additional expenses to use effectively.

With the introduction of Apple Invites, the conversation around copycat tactics within tech giants is reignited. Developers are left wondering how their innovations can be safeguarded against larger competitors and whether or not the guidelines meant to protect them hold any real power. The future will tell how this situation evolves as users choose between these applications, and whether Partiful's unique qualities will suffice to retain its user base amid the competitive wave of Apple's influence.

Overall, as Apple pushes forward with Invites, the nuances of app innovation, competition, and intellectual property remain challenges not just for Partiful but all developers facing the might of tech behemoths.