Today : Jan 27, 2025
Science
26 January 2025

Age And Sex Impact HE4 Accuracy For Pleural Effusions

New research reveals diagnostic performance of HE4 declines with patient age, emphasizing the need for adjusted interpretations.

Understanding malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is pivotal for effective cancer diagnosis and treatment. Recent findings indicate the diagnostic accuracy of human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) is significantly influenced by the patient’s age, prompting professionals to rethink the implementation of HE4 as a reliable biomarker.

Malignant pleural effusion often arises from metastatic cancers, with lung cancer being the most common cause. Historically, correct identification of MPE has depended on traditional methods such as cytological analysis and pleural biopsy, which, though effective, can sometimes yield misleading results. This makes the search for alternative diagnostic markers like HE4 all the more important.

HE4 is already recognized for its efficacy, with previous studies reporting its ability to help distinguish MPE from benign pleural effusions (BPE), achieving moderate accuracy. The recent study led by researchers from the Affiliated Changshu Hospital of Nantong University builds on this foundation by investigating how demographic factors—specifically age and sex—affect HE4's diagnostic capabilities.

From June 2020 to July 2021, two cohorts were studied to examine pleural effusions of unknown origin. The first cohort was based at the Changshu Hospital, with the second recruited from the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University. Participants underwent thorough diagnostic evaluations, including the collection of pleural fluid samples analyzed through electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.

Key findings revealed age as a significant factor, with older patients showing decreased diagnostic accuracy for HE4. The results demonstrated, as noted by the authors of the article, "the diagnostic accuracy of HE4 decreased as age increased in both cohorts." This correlation suggests specific biological factors tied to aging may impact HE4 performance.

Despite the study confirming the influence of age, results indicated no significant difference across sexes concerning HE4's diagnostic capabilities. The study's authors conclude, "we conclude age should be considered when using HE4 in pleural fluid to diagnose MPE."

Significantly, these findings challenge previous assumptions surrounding sex as a confounding variable, underscoring age's role as the principal factor impacting diagnostic accuracy. This provides clinicians with renewed insight on tailoring diagnostic strategies for MPE, highlighting the necessity for age-specific threshold values for HE4.

While the study marks progress, it also calls for more extensive research to confirm these findings. The authors have acknowledged limitations, particularly the small sample sizes, and advocate for external validation studies to reinforce these conclusions across diverse populations.

Concluding this research raises the significance of age when utilizing HE4 levels to diagnose malignant pleural effusions. The intersection of medical science and patient demographics presents fertile ground for future research, potentially paving the way for more accurate and patient-centered diagnostic practices.