Today : Nov 12, 2025
Politics
12 November 2025

Fetterman Faces Backlash After Senate Shutdown Vote

The Pennsylvania senator defends his decision to end the 41-day government shutdown, citing food assistance and military pay, as critics warn of healthcare risks and party divisions.

Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania found himself at the center of a political firestorm this week after breaking with much of his party to support a Senate bill that ended a 41-day partial government shutdown. The vote, which passed the Senate on November 10, 2025, with the help of eight Democratic caucus members including Fetterman, was met with both sharp criticism and measured praise across the political spectrum. Fetterman took to ABC’s The View on November 11 to defend his decision, arguing that the stakes for everyday Americans were simply too high to allow the shutdown to continue.

"I refuse to weaponize SNAP benefits for 42 million Americans that rely on it for feeding themselves or their family, or making flying in America less safe. I refuse not to pay our military and all of the unions attached to this," Fetterman told the hosts of The View, as reported by WPVI and echoed in several outlets. His remarks underscored a theme he would return to repeatedly: that the human cost of the shutdown outweighed any political advantage gained by holding out for additional concessions.

The continuing resolution, which now awaits action in the House, extends current government funding levels through March 2026. According to VINnews, the measure averted deeper cuts to social programs but drew the ire of progressives who argued that Democrats had momentum after recent electoral victories and should have pressed harder for policy wins—especially on healthcare. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, after a lengthy caucus meeting, ultimately opposed the bill, stating, "We will not give up the fight," and warning that Democrats had now "sounded the alarm" on healthcare.

On The View, co-host Sunny Hostin pressed Fetterman hard on the potential consequences of his vote, warning, "Your Pennsylvanians’ healthcare will skyrocket!" She quoted other prominent critics, including Sen. Bernie Sanders and Gov. Gavin Newsom, and even referenced Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s criticisms of the GOP’s handling of negotiations. Hostin’s pointed question: "Why give in now? Why bring a butter knife to a gunfight? Are you willing to gamble that the GOP will negotiate on healthcare in good faith once the government reopens? Because if that gamble is wrong, half a million Pennsylvanians that you represent, their healthcare costs will skyrocket if you are wrong, and I believe you are wrong."

Fetterman, appearing remotely from Pennsylvania, didn’t flinch. "MTG is quite literally the last person in America that I’m going to take advice or to get their kinds of my leadership and values from. Now, if Democrats are celebrating crazy pants like that, then that’s on them. Now, I don’t need a lecture from, whether it’s Bernie or the governor in California, because they are representing very deep-blue kinds of populations and a lot of those things were part of the extreme," he shot back, as reported by Fox News and The Philadelphia Inquirer.

He continued, emphasizing the real-world impact of the shutdown: "This shutdown is not a political game. Forty-two million Americans now are not sure where their next meal is going to come from, and because we vote like that. Or people that haven’t been paid for five weeks now, and that kinds of chaos. Those workers borrow more than half a billion dollars from their credit union just to pay their bills." Fetterman’s focus on the hardships faced by federal workers and families relying on nutrition assistance resonated with some moderates and centrists, even as it drew the ire of progressives and party activists.

The shutdown itself was triggered by a Democratic filibuster over spending levels, a tactical move designed to force Republicans to the negotiating table on issues like healthcare and social spending. Yet, as the weeks dragged on, the shutdown resulted in halted paychecks for federal employees and disruptions to essential programs like SNAP, fueling anxiety among millions of Americans. According to The Philadelphia Inquirer, Fetterman argued, "When you’re confronting mass chaos, you know, I don’t think you should respond with more chaos or fight with more chaos. It’s like, no, we need to be the party of order and logic."

Fetterman’s willingness to cross party lines was shared by seven other senators, including Angus King (I-Maine), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the number two Democrat in the Senate. Their votes proved decisive in passing the Republican-backed continuing resolution, a move that, while controversial, ended the immediate crisis for federal workers and recipients of federal assistance programs.

For Fetterman, the calculus was clear: "I refuse to weaponize the SNAP benefit for 42 million Americans that rely on feeding themselves and their family, or making flying in America, you know, less safe, or I refuse not to pay our military and all of the unions attached to all of this, and people. So for me it’s like I don’t agree with that tactic to respond to circumstances that we’re confronting on this," he said, reiterating his stance during the interview.

The political fallout was swift. Progressive groups and some party leaders accused Fetterman and his colleagues of caving to Republican pressure and missing a rare opportunity to extract meaningful policy concessions. Hostin, reflecting this frustration, said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s days were "over" and called for new leadership, arguing that he had failed to keep his caucus united. Schumer, for his part, maintained his opposition to the bill, insisting that Democrats would continue to fight for healthcare protections and other priorities.

Amid the heated debate, Fetterman used his appearance on The View to promote his new memoir, Unfettered, published the same day. The book delves into his personal journey, including his struggles with depression, his sometimes fraught relationships with political allies like Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, and even a meeting with former President Donald Trump. Fetterman said he hoped sharing his mental health story would help others facing similar challenges: "I know it may not be a big political winner to talk about these things, but I do think it’s an important one to have, because a lot of people are suffering and may not able to talk about it."

Throughout the controversy, Fetterman remained adamant that his votes were motivated by a desire to serve the interests of his "purple" state. "That might be a bigger problem with our party in some way that a committed Democrat from the most difficult and purple state in the country says, ‘Hey, you know, I’m trying to call balls and strikes in the middle of this chaos,’" he reflected, acknowledging the unique pressures he faces as a senator from a politically divided state.

With the government now reopened and the debate over strategy and priorities raging on, Fetterman’s actions have sparked a broader conversation within the Democratic Party about how to balance principle, pragmatism, and the needs of everyday Americans in times of crisis.