On the morning of November 1, 2025, what was meant to be a day of devotion at the Venkateswara Temple in Kasibugga, Andhra Pradesh, turned into a catastrophe. A sudden, overwhelming surge of devotees led to a deadly stampede, claiming at least nine lives—most of them women and children—and leaving the community reeling with grief and unanswered questions. The tragedy, which unfolded as railings gave way and exits became hopelessly jammed, is only the latest in a distressing series of similar incidents across India this year.
According to The Times of India, the temple’s 95-year-old builder, Harimukund Panda, was stunned by the turnout. "I thought it would be the same today. Suddenly, a huge crowd came. They pushed the gates and left," Panda recounted to Telugu media, describing a scene that quickly spiraled out of control. The temple, which typically welcomes 3,000 to 4,000 devotees daily, was inundated by a crowd that swelled to 25,000—far exceeding its usual weekend capacity of 10,000 to 15,000, as reported by Hindustan Times.
Preliminary reports and statements from Andhra Pradesh minister Nara Lokesh pointed to a perfect storm of missteps and misfortune. Lokesh explained, "At 11:30 am, because there was an unknown amount of rush, the entry point was closed. Many people who attended felt that they could use the exit route. That created a lot of suffocation." The minister added that, in the chaos, a person tripped on the steps at the entry, setting off a cascading effect as the crowd pressed forward. Most of those who died were women, and the government scrambled to coordinate a rescue operation, reaching out to officials via a real-time governance WhatsApp group that included the disaster management minister. "We worked exceptionally hard to save as many lives as possible," Lokesh said.
The area where the stampede occurred was under construction, compounding the danger. Makeshift arrangements were inadequate, and, crucially, the entry and exit routes overlapped—a recipe for disaster, as highlighted by Indian Express. The state administration later claimed it was not informed of the special celebrations for Ekadashi, the auspicious day that drew the unexpected throngs.
Panda, who built the temple four years ago at a cost of Rs 10 crore on 12 acres of his 50-acre property, expressed deep shock. The temple was intended as a peaceful haven for worshippers, a vision born from his own experience witnessing pushing and shoving at the crowded Tirumala Srivari Temple. "Every day, devotees come. They have darshan and leave. I alone maintained all of them. I used to tell everyone to go carefully. Those who went would have darshan and leave," he said. Yet, on that fateful day, the system was overwhelmed. "The police didn't tell them, no one told them. People came all at once," Panda lamented.
Despite his insistence that "nobody is responsible, it was an act of god," authorities have registered a case against Panda as part of the ongoing investigation. The incident has reignited a national debate about accountability and crowd management in India’s bustling public spaces. Editorials published in Hindustan Times and Indian Express have criticized the tendency to treat such disasters as unfortunate but inevitable, rather than preventable tragedies demanding real change.
Kasibugga’s tragedy is not an isolated event. In January, a stampede at the Tirupati temple in Andhra Pradesh claimed six lives. In February, a similar incident at New Delhi railway station during rush hour left 18 commuters, mostly Kumbh Mela pilgrims, dead. Just a month before, at least 30 devotees lost their lives at a Mela site. The grim roll call continued in June when a stampede outside Bengaluru’s M Chinnaswamy Stadium killed 11 fans and injured over 50, and, most recently, in September, nearly 40 people died at a rally in Karur, Tamil Nadu. The pattern is depressingly familiar: crowds exceeding expectations, poor planning, and a disregard for safety regulations.
The editorial boards have called out what they see as institutional and administrative apathy. Crowd management, they argue, is treated as an afterthought rather than a science. The National Disaster Management Authority’s guidelines, which emphasize the need for trained personnel, real-time monitoring, and clearly demarcated entry and exit points, are all too often ignored. "Lax enforcement of safety codes by states and organisers’ indifference to capacity limits create a culture of inevitability, where every stampede is described as 'unfortunate' rather than unacceptable," wrote Hindustan Times.
For the victims—many from disadvantaged backgrounds, women who came in faith, and children who clung to their mothers’ hands until the crush separated them—condolences and platitudes are not enough. The call for accountability has grown louder, with critics demanding that states, temple trusts, and event organizers treat crowd management as an urgent imperative, not a box to be ticked after disaster strikes.
Yet, amid the grief and finger-pointing, there are voices urging constructive action. As noted in an editorial published on November 3, 2025, blame games will not bring back the lost lives or prevent future tragedies. Instead, the focus must shift to implementing meaningful reforms—ensuring that public spaces, whether temples, stations, or stadiums, are equipped to handle the crowds that are an inescapable feature of Indian life. It’s a challenge that requires not just better infrastructure, but a fundamental change in attitude toward public safety.
The investigation into the Kasibugga stampede continues, with authorities sifting through witness accounts, security footage, and the tangled web of responsibility. For Harimukund Panda, the temple’s founder, the tragedy is a heartbreaking reversal of his dream to offer a sanctuary of peace. For the families of the victims, it is a wound that will not easily heal. For India, it is yet another painful reminder that, until crowd management is taken seriously, such preventable disasters will remain all too common.
As the nation mourns, the hope is that this time, the lessons will not be forgotten—and that the next gathering of faith, celebration, or community will be remembered not for tragedy, but for safety and care.