Economy

Rachel Reeves Eyes Wealthy And Pensions In Budget Shakeup

Labour’s Autumn Budget could bring sweeping pension reforms, higher National Insurance bills, and targeted tax changes as the government seeks £22 billion in new revenue.

6 min read

As the United Kingdom approaches the highly anticipated Autumn Budget announcement on November 26, 2025, all eyes are on Chancellor Rachel Reeves and her plans for sweeping tax and pension reforms. With mounting fiscal pressures, an ageing population, and persistent economic uncertainty, the stakes for this year’s budget could hardly be higher. The government faces a daunting task: balancing the need for increased revenue with the imperative to maintain business confidence and household stability.

According to Treasury insiders cited by Daily Business, Reeves is unlikely to impose more direct taxes on businesses. The rationale? There’s growing concern that such a move could further erode already fragile business confidence. Instead, the focus appears to be shifting toward assets held by the wealthy, with Reeves aiming to ensure, in her own words, that “those with the broadest shoulders” pay more. Yet, she has explicitly ruled out the introduction of an individual wealth tax—a policy that has stirred much debate in recent years.

Instead, the Chancellor is reportedly weighing up a series of targeted measures. Among them: introducing national insurance payments on income derived from rental properties and revising capital gains tax rules on more expensive homes. There’s also talk of removing the 5% VAT charge on domestic gas and electricity—a move that would save the average consumer about £86 a year. Pressure is mounting, too, for Reeves to scrap certain levies, such as climate change contributions, that are currently tacked onto consumer energy bills.

Yet, the scale of the fiscal challenge is significant. Tax specialists estimate that Reeves will need to find approximately £22 billion in additional tax revenue in her November budget. This daunting figure is the result of recent U-turns on spending cuts, higher borrowing costs, and a string of downbeat economic forecasts. Speaking from Washington, where she attended an International Monetary Fund (IMF) meeting, Reeves pointed to her past record: the imposition of VAT on private school fees, the elimination of non-dom tax status, and increased taxes on private jets. “Judge me by my record last year,” she said, signaling her willingness to take tough decisions but also hinting at possible concessions to address business concerns.

One area of particular anxiety for businesses is national insurance contributions. Last year’s hike, many argue, curbed investment and recruitment, contributing to the UK’s sluggish growth. Reeves acknowledged these concerns, stating, “It’s not all about tax, but I do want to have a competitive environment for all businesses in Britain. We have to get the balance right.” She also revealed plans to double the number of visas available to highly talented, high-paid individuals, aiming to attract top talent and bolster the UK’s competitive edge.

Economic data paints a mixed picture. As Daily Business reports, gross domestic product (GDP) for August 2025 was a meager 0.1%, following a downwardly revised 0.1% in July. Julian Jessop, Economics Fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs, observed, “The big picture is that the UK economy has stalled again as pre-Budget jitters have frozen activity in the private sector. This is confirmed by multiple surveys across the full range of businesses—including services, retail, manufacturing, construction, and the housing and labour markets.” Jessop urged the Chancellor to use the November statement to restore confidence, suggesting that any tax rises should be broad-based to minimize economic distortion and uncertainty. “But it would clearly be much better to focus on controlling public spending and freeing the private sector to drive growth instead,” he added.

Despite the current malaise, the IMF offers a glimmer of hope. The UK is expected to post the second-fastest growth among advanced economies in 2026, with projected growth rates of 1.3% for both 2025 and 2026. However, the forecast comes with a caveat: the UK is also expected to have the highest annual average inflation in the G7 for 2025 and 2026, at 3.4% and 2.5% respectively, largely due to stubbornly high energy and utility bills.

But perhaps the most contentious—and closely watched—aspect of the upcoming budget revolves around pensions. As reported by The Mirror and The Express, tax consultancy RSM UK has warned that Reeves may have “pensions firmly in her sights” this autumn. Ian Bell, partner and head of pensions at RSM UK, outlined several possible changes: increasing tax or national insurance contributions for pensioners, removing or restricting the tax-free status on pension commencement lump sums, and altering tax relief on pension contributions, potentially moving to a flat rate of around 30%.

One particularly significant change under consideration is the removal of the salary sacrifice option for pension contributions. Currently, salary sacrifice allows employees to reduce their salary in exchange for equivalent employer pension contributions, which benefit from tax relief and are exempt from both income tax and national insurance. Eliminating this option could lead to higher national insurance bills for both employees and employers, boosting government revenue but potentially eroding a popular method of long-term wealth planning.

Carlton Crabbe, a finance and insurance expert at Capital for Life, highlighted the broader context: “Each Autumn Statement brings whispers of reform, but this year, the stakes are higher. With the UK facing an ageing population, rising life expectancy, and persistent fiscal pressures, pensions are an increasingly tempting target for tax policy changes.” He warned that restricting higher-rate tax relief would particularly impact middle- to high-income earners who depend on pensions for their long-term financial security. Any move to limit the 25% tax-free lump sum—currently allowed from age 55 and capped at £268,275—would also have major implications for millions of Britons nearing retirement.

When pressed about potential policy shifts, an HM Treasury spokesperson offered little clarity, stating simply, “We do not comment on speculation around future changes to tax policy.” The lack of detail has only fueled speculation and anxiety among savers, pensioners, and financial planners alike.

As the budget date draws near, the country waits to see how Reeves will thread the needle between fiscal responsibility and economic growth. Will she target the assets of the wealthy, overhaul pension tax relief, or deliver a surprise move to ease household energy costs? The answers will shape the financial landscape for years to come, touching everyone from young professionals to retirees. One thing is certain: this is no ordinary budget, and the decisions made in November will echo throughout the UK economy and society well into the future.

Sources