World News

French Mayor Jailed For Blackmail In Sex Tape Scandal

Gaël Perdriau of Saint-Etienne is sentenced to prison and banned from office after being found guilty of orchestrating a blackmail plot against his former deputy.

5 min read

On December 1, 2025, a French court delivered a verdict that sent shockwaves through the nation’s political landscape. Gaël Perdriau, the long-serving mayor of Saint-Etienne, was sentenced to four years in jail and handed a five-year ban from public office after being found guilty of blackmailing a political rival with a secretly filmed sex tape. The case, tried in the eastern city of Lyon, has exposed the darker underbelly of political maneuvering and personal vendetta in one of France’s prominent industrial cities.

Perdriau, who had held the mayor’s office since 2014, stood accused of orchestrating a plot against his former deputy, Gilles Artigues. The two men’s relationship had once appeared professional, but beneath the surface, tensions simmered—particularly as Artigues, a Roman Catholic known for his opposition to gay marriage, became the target of a scandal that would ultimately derail both men’s careers.

According to reporting from AFP and RFI, the court found Perdriau guilty on three serious counts: blackmail, criminal conspiracy, and diverting public funds. The presiding judge, Brigitte Vernay, left no room for ambiguity in her ruling, stating that Perdriau was “entirely guilty.” The sentence—four years behind bars, with an additional year suspended, and an immediate five-year prohibition from holding public office—marks a dramatic fall from grace for the 53-year-old politician.

The origins of the case date back to early 2015, when a sex tape was secretly filmed in a hotel room, capturing Artigues with a male sex worker. Prosecutors argued that Perdriau commissioned the recording not for personal reasons, but as a tool to secure Artigues’ unwavering loyalty. As prosecutor Audrey Quey told the court, “He was the one with his finger on the nuclear button,” describing Perdriau as the “decision-maker” in a plot that relied on threats and fear to maintain control.

Three co-defendants, including Perdriau’s former chief of staff and another deputy, admitted their roles in setting up the trap. They, too, received prison sentences, underscoring the depth of the conspiracy that had taken root within Saint-Etienne’s city hall. The court’s findings painted a picture of calculated manipulation, where power was wielded not through public service, but through intimidation and secrecy.

Despite the damning evidence and the court’s unequivocal judgment, Perdriau has maintained his innocence throughout the proceedings. He has consistently denied ordering the recording of the tape or participating in any blackmail scheme. After the verdict was read, Perdriau reiterated his stance and vowed to appeal the decision, setting the stage for a potential legal battle that could further captivate and divide public opinion.

The heart of the prosecution’s case rested on a crucial piece of evidence: a secretly recorded conversation from 2017. In this recording, Artigues captured Perdriau threatening to release a USB stick containing compromising images if Artigues did not comply. The existence of the recording left little room for doubt in the eyes of the court. For Artigues, the psychological impact was devastating. He testified that the ongoing threat left him feeling “paralysed in city hall meetings.” In his own words, “I was like a puppet. They put me there, and I smiled.”

The personal toll of the ordeal was profound. Artigues revealed that the blackmail drove him to the brink, admitting to the court that he had suffered suicidal thoughts during the years he lived under the shadow of exposure. The emotional weight of the trial was evident as Artigues, surrounded by family, welcomed the court’s verdict. “Today, I think I will be able to rebuild my life,” he said, a statement that resonated with many who have followed the case from its inception.

The case has also raised uncomfortable questions about the use of public funds for personal or political gain. The court’s finding that Perdriau diverted public resources to orchestrate the blackmail plot has sparked outrage among citizens and watchdog groups alike. In a democracy, the expectation is that elected officials serve the public good—not their own interests or vendettas. The revelations from Saint-Etienne have prompted calls for greater transparency and accountability in local government, with many wondering how such a scheme could have gone undetected for so long.

Political analysts have noted that the scandal touches on broader issues within French politics, including the intersection of personal morality and public life. Artigues’ status as a vocal opponent of gay marriage added a layer of complexity to the case, highlighting how personal beliefs and political rivalries can become dangerously intertwined. The use of a sex tape involving a male sex worker as a weapon against a conservative Catholic politician has fueled debate about the lengths to which individuals will go to protect or destroy reputations.

The fallout from the verdict is likely to reverberate well beyond the borders of Saint-Etienne. For the city’s residents, the scandal has been both a source of embarrassment and a rallying point for calls to reform. For Perdriau’s supporters, the sentence is a bitter pill, while critics argue it is a necessary reckoning with the abuse of power. The case has also exposed vulnerabilities in France’s political system, where personal enmities and unchecked authority can lead to profound breaches of trust.

Looking ahead, the immediate future for Saint-Etienne’s city government is uncertain. With Perdriau barred from office and several key officials facing prison time, the city must now navigate a period of transition and rebuilding. Observers note that the case may serve as a cautionary tale for politicians across France, a stark reminder that the pursuit of power must never come at the expense of ethics and the rule of law.

As the legal process continues—with Perdriau’s promised appeal looming—the people of Saint-Etienne and the wider French public are left to grapple with the implications of a scandal that has laid bare the dangers of political intrigue. For Gilles Artigues, at least, the verdict brings a measure of closure and the hope of a new beginning after years of manipulation and fear.

Sources